Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):548-556. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003661.
We sought to describe contemporary presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute (A), perforated (P), and gangrenous (G) appendicitis in the United States.
Recent European trials have reported that medical (antibiotics only) treatment of acute appendicitis is an acceptable alternative to surgical appendectomy. However, the type of operation (open appendectomy) and average duration of stay are not consistent with current American practice and therefore their conclusions do not apply to modern American surgeons.
This multicenter prospective observational study enrolled adults with appendicitis from January 2017 to June 2018. Descriptive statistics were performed. P and G were combined into a "complicated" outcome variable and risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
A total 3597 subjects were enrolled across 28 sites: median age was 37 (27-52) years, 1918 (53%) were male, 90% underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging, 91% were initially treated by appendectomy (98% laparoscopic), and median hospital stay was 1 (1-2) day. The 30-day rates of Emergency Department (ED) visit and readmission were 10% and 6%. Of 219 initially treated with antibiotics, 35 (16%) required appendectomy during index hospitalization and 12 (5%) underwent appendectomy within 30 days, for a cumulative failure rate of 21%. Overall, 2403 (77%) patients had A, whereas 487 (16%) and 218 (7%) patients had P and G, respectively. On regression analysis, age, symptoms >48 hours, temperature, WBC, Alvarado score, and appendicolith were predictive of "complicated" appendicitis, whereas co-morbidities, smoking, and ED triage to appendectomy >6 hours or >12 hours were not.
In the United States, the majority of patients presenting with appendicitis receive CT imaging, undergo laparoscopic appendectomy, and stay in the hospital for 1 day. One in five patients selected for initial non-operative management required appendectomy within 30 days. In-hospital delay to appendectomy is not a risk factor for "complicated" appendicitis.
我们旨在描述美国急性(A)、穿孔(P)和坏疽性(G)阑尾炎患者的当代临床表现、治疗方法和结局。
最近的欧洲试验报告称,单纯药物(仅用抗生素)治疗急性阑尾炎是一种可接受的阑尾切除术替代方法。然而,手术类型(开腹阑尾切除术)和平均住院时间与当前美国的实践并不一致,因此其结论不适用于现代美国外科医生。
这项多中心前瞻性观察性研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间患有阑尾炎的成年人。进行了描述性统计分析。将 P 和 G 合并为一个“复杂”结局变量,并使用多变量逻辑回归评估风险因素。
在 28 个地点共纳入了 3597 名受试者:中位年龄为 37(27-52)岁,1918 名(53%)为男性,90%接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)成像,91%最初接受了阑尾切除术(98%为腹腔镜手术),中位住院时间为 1(1-2)天。30 天内急诊就诊和再入院的比例分别为 10%和 6%。在最初接受抗生素治疗的 219 名患者中,35 名(16%)在住院期间需要行阑尾切除术,12 名(5%)在 30 天内行阑尾切除术,累积失败率为 21%。总体而言,2403 名(77%)患者患有 A,487 名(16%)和 218 名(7%)患者分别患有 P 和 G。回归分析显示,年龄、症状>48 小时、体温、白细胞计数、Alvarado 评分和阑尾结石是“复杂”阑尾炎的预测因素,而合并症、吸烟以及在急诊科分诊至行阑尾切除术>6 小时或>12 小时不是。
在美国,大多数患有阑尾炎的患者接受 CT 成像,行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,并在医院住院 1 天。五分之一选择初始非手术治疗的患者在 30 天内需要行阑尾切除术。住院期间行阑尾切除术的延迟并不是“复杂”阑尾炎的风险因素。