Suppr超能文献

固定思维模式和绝望感对焦虑和抑郁症状的影响:一种共性分析方法。

Contributions of fixed mindsets and hopelessness to anxiety and depressive symptoms: A commonality analysis approach.

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin, United States.

Stony Brook University, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 15;261:245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fixed mindsets (beliefs that personal traits are unchangeable) show consistent associations with internalizing symptoms. However, the mindset-internalizing symptom link has previously been studied in isolation of other maladaptive cognitions that relate to internalizing symptoms. Thus, the unique contributions of mindsets to internalizing symptoms remains unclear.

METHOD

We used commonality analysis (CA), which yields unique and shared effects of independent variables on an outcome, to assess unique contributions of emotion and anxiety mindsets to anxiety and depression symptoms, relative to the contributions of hopelessness. Participants in two online studies (Ns=200, 430) self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms, hopelessness, and emotion and anxiety mindsets.

RESULTS

In Study 1, neither mindset type contributed unique variance to depression or anxiety beyond the contribution of hopelessness. In Study 2, emotion mindsets again explained no unique symptom variance. Anxiety mindsets uniquely contributed 2.0% and 6.5% of depression and anxiety variance, respectively-but far larger proportions of symptom variance (20.0%-60.9%) were contributed by hopelessness alone, variance shared by hopelessness and anxiety mindsets, and variance shared among hopelessness, anxiety mindsets, and emotion mindsets.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design precludes causal conclusions, and the non-referred adult samples may limit generalizability.

DISCUSSION

Mindsets contributed little unique variance to internalizing symptoms beyond hopelessness. Interventions teaching growth mindsets have been shown to reduce internalizing problem in past studies. However, these interventions might not necessarily operate by shaping mindsets; rather, they may affect symptom change by shaping closely-linked maladaptive cognitions-like hopelessness-with stronger ties to internalizing distress.

摘要

背景

固定心态(即个人特质不可改变的信念)与内化症状存在一致的关联。然而,心态与内化症状之间的联系之前是在没有考虑到与内化症状相关的其他适应不良认知的情况下进行研究的。因此,心态对内化症状的独特贡献仍不清楚。

方法

我们使用共性分析(CA),该方法可以评估独立变量对结果的独特和共同影响,从而评估情绪和焦虑心态对焦虑和抑郁症状的独特贡献,相对于绝望感的贡献。两项在线研究的参与者(N=200,430)自我报告了抑郁和焦虑症状、绝望感以及情绪和焦虑心态。

结果

在研究 1 中,除了绝望感之外,没有一种心态类型对抑郁或焦虑有独特的影响。在研究 2 中,情绪心态再次没有解释任何独特的症状方差。焦虑心态分别独特地解释了抑郁和焦虑方差的 2.0%和 6.5%,但更大比例的症状方差(20.0%-60.9%)仅由绝望感、绝望感和焦虑心态之间的共享方差以及绝望感、焦虑心态和情绪心态之间的共享方差来解释。

局限性

横断面设计排除了因果关系的结论,并且非被试的成年样本可能限制了普遍性。

讨论

心态对内化症状的独特贡献除了绝望感之外没有什么贡献。过去的研究表明,教授成长心态的干预措施可以减少内化问题。然而,这些干预措施可能不一定通过塑造心态来运作;相反,它们可能通过塑造与内化困扰密切相关的适应不良认知,如绝望感,来影响症状的变化,这些认知与内化困扰的联系更紧密。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验