School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Internal Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020702. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020702.
Using an interrupted time series design, we conducted segmented regression analyses of utilization changes of targeted anti-cancer medicines covered by the provincial government health insurance program during 2013 to 2016 in 69 hospitals with more than 100 beds in Hangzhou, the capital city of Zhejiang province of China. The WHO/Health Action International Project on Medicine Prices and Availability methodology was used to measure patient affordability of the study medicines.
In March 2015, the utilization of all study medicines increased by 15.58 (95% CI = 3.86, 27.30, = 0.01) to 439.14 standard units (95% CI = 311.79, 566.49, < 0.001). Before covered by government health insurance, the estimated out-of-pocket payment by patient ranged from 3.0 to 13.1 times of the provincial average disposable annual income per capita for urban residents, and 6.2 to 27.3 times for rural residents. Such payments were reduced to 0.6 to 2.1 times for urban residents and 1.8 to 4.4 times for rural population after government health insurance coverage inclusion. During 2015 to 2016, the per capita contribution to Hangzhou catastrophic health insurance program was CNY15 (US$ 2.3), and the reimbursement rate was 70% in Hangzhou city. The cumulative total insurance expenses on six study targeted anticancer medicines accounted for an estimated 53% of the total amount of premiums of the government catastrophic health insurance fund. Sensitivity analyses indicated that this proportion would have changed to 46%, 61% and 69% when changing the per capita contribution to CNY25 (US$ 3.8) and CNY40 (US$ 6.2), and changing the insurance reimbursement rate to 60%, 80 and 90%.
Government health insurance coverage inclusion significantly increased utilization of the expensive targeted anti-cancer medicines, and improved patient affordability. However, the financial burden of patients is still high, especially for the rural low-income population. Rising utilization and expenditures call for careful monitoring of anti-cancer medicines use, and for strategies to decrease prices to facilitate medicines access and keep the insurance system sustainable.
采用中断时间序列设计,对中国浙江省省会杭州市 69 家拥有 100 张以上床位的医院在 2013 年至 2016 年期间省政府医疗保险计划覆盖的靶向抗癌药物的使用变化进行分段回归分析。采用世界卫生组织/国际卫生行动项目药品价格和可及性方法来衡量研究药物患者的负担能力。
2015 年 3 月,所有研究药物的使用率增加了 15.58(95%CI=3.86,27.30,=0.01),达到 439.14 个标准单位(95%CI=311.79,566.49,<0.001)。在纳入政府医疗保险之前,患者的自付费用估计为城镇居民人均可支配年收入的 3.0 至 13.1 倍,农村居民为 6.2 至 27.3 倍。纳入政府医疗保险后,城镇居民的自付费用减少到 0.6 至 2.1 倍,农村居民减少到 1.8 至 4.4 倍。2015 年至 2016 年,杭州市灾难性健康保险计划每人缴费 15 元人民币(2.3 美元),杭州市报销率为 70%。六类研究靶向抗癌药物的累计保险费用占政府灾难性健康保险基金总保费的估计 53%。敏感性分析表明,当人均缴费额从 25 元人民币(3.8 美元)增加到 40 元人民币(6.2 美元),以及保险报销率从 60%提高到 80%和 90%时,这一比例将分别变为 46%、61%和 69%。
政府医疗保险覆盖范围的扩大显著增加了昂贵的靶向抗癌药物的使用,提高了患者的负担能力。然而,患者的经济负担仍然很高,尤其是农村低收入人群。利用和支出的增加需要对抗癌药物的使用进行仔细监测,并采取降低价格的策略,以促进药物的可及性并保持保险制度的可持续性。