Schroeder Samuel R, Leenders Michael, Iyengar Puneeth, de Ruysscher Dirk
Department of Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 2):S184-S191. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.07.09.
There is growing interest in exploring use of local therapies in the management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to provide durable local and distant disease control. Prospective phase II studies have incorporated local therapy (predominantly stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or SABR) to both primary and metastatic sites. For patients who received these treatments, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) exceeded that of historical controls treated with systemic therapy alone (9.7-23.5 and 13.5-41.2 months, respectively). Additionally, three trials randomized oligometastatic NSCLC patients to standard of care systemic therapy regimens local consolidative therapy (LCT) plus standard of care systemic therapy (or observation) and all demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS, with two showing OS benefits to date. Notably, a majority of these trials selected patients with at least stable disease after completion of systemic therapy for local therapy and defined the oligometastatic state as one with no more than five metastatic sites spread across three organs. For patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, there are many important factors that should drive use and timing of local therapy, including metastatic presentation sequence (synchronous metachronous), extent of disease (number and distribution of sites), and quality of life goals. The referenced clinical trials accrued patients prior to the approval of immunotherapy for metastatic NSCLC, so the benefits of any local therapy in this setting remain uncertain. To ultimately clarify the role of local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC in the era of improving systemic therapy efficacy (i.e., immunotherapy and targeted therapy combinations with cytotoxics), we recommend enrollment in in phase III studies with OS endpoints (i.e., NRG LU 002 and SARON) whenever possible. These and other important issues associated with local therapy for oligometastatic NSCLC are reviewed in this paper.
在寡转移非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗中,探索局部治疗的应用以实现持久的局部和远处疾病控制,这一兴趣正与日俱增。前瞻性II期研究已将局部治疗(主要是立体定向消融放疗或SABR)应用于原发灶和转移灶。对于接受这些治疗的患者,无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的中位数超过了仅接受全身治疗的历史对照患者(分别为9.7 - 23.5个月和13.5 - 41.2个月)。此外,三项试验将寡转移NSCLC患者随机分为标准治疗全身治疗方案、局部巩固治疗(LCT)加标准治疗全身治疗(或观察),所有试验均显示PFS有显著改善,其中两项试验至今显示出OS获益。值得注意的是,这些试验中的大多数选择了在全身治疗完成后至少疾病稳定的患者进行局部治疗,并将寡转移状态定义为转移灶不超过五个且分布在三个器官的状态。对于寡转移NSCLC患者,有许多重要因素应推动局部治疗的使用和时机选择,包括转移表现顺序(同时性与异时性)、疾病范围(部位数量和分布)以及生活质量目标。所引用的临床试验是在转移性NSCLC免疫治疗获批之前招募患者的,因此在这种情况下任何局部治疗的益处仍不确定。为了最终阐明在全身治疗疗效不断提高的时代(即免疫治疗以及免疫治疗与细胞毒性药物的联合靶向治疗)局部治疗在寡转移NSCLC中的作用,我们建议尽可能参加以OS为终点的III期研究(即NRG LU 002和SARON)。本文将对这些以及与寡转移NSCLC局部治疗相关的其他重要问题进行综述。