Sonigo Charlotte, Sermondade Nathalie, Calvo Jéremy, Benard Julie, Sifer Christophe, Grynberg Michaël
Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.
Inserm U1185, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94276, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 11;4:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100049. eCollection 2019 Oct.
Oocyte and/or embryo vitrification after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) represents the most established method of fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. However, traditional COS regimens are associated with supraphysiologic serum estradiol and are therefore not recommended in estrogen-sensitive diseases such as breast cancer (BC). To protect the patients from the potential deleterious effects of elevated estrogen levels during COS for FP, protocols using aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) were developed. The present study aims at investigating whether COS with letrozole supplementation (COSTLES) modifies ovarian response in BC patients.
One hundred and seventy-seven BC patients candidates for FP using oocyte and/or embryo vitrification following COS referred to our center between July 2013 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective case-control study. 94 patients underwent COSTLES while 83 had standard GnRH antagonist protocol. The number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rates, number of oocytes vitrified and follicle responsiveness to FSH assessed by the Follicular Output Rate (FORT) were assessed.
Women in both groups were comparable in terms of age and ovarian reserve tests leading to a similar number of oocyte recovered (13.1 ± 10.0 vs. 12.2 ± 8.0 oocytes, respectively, ). However, oocyte maturation rates were significantly lower in COSTLES compared to standard protocol (64.9 ± 22.8 vs. 77.4 ± 19.3%, p < 0.001). As a result, the number of mature oocyte vitrified was lower in COSTLES group (7.8 ± 5.3 vs. 10.3 ± 8.5 oocytes, p < 0.001 respectively).
Despite similar response to exogenous FSH, BC patients having undergone COSTLES show reduced oocyte maturation rates in comparison with those having received standard stimulation regimen.
在控制性卵巢刺激(COS)后进行卵母细胞和/或胚胎玻璃化冷冻是癌症治疗前最成熟的生育力保存(FP)方法。然而,传统的COS方案会导致血清雌二醇水平超出生理范围,因此不建议用于乳腺癌(BC)等雌激素敏感疾病。为保护患者在进行FP的COS过程中免受雌激素水平升高的潜在有害影响,开发了使用芳香化酶抑制剂(来曲唑)的方案。本研究旨在调查补充来曲唑的COS(COSTLES)是否会改变BC患者的卵巢反应。
本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2013年7月至2016年12月期间转诊至本中心的177例计划在COS后使用卵母细胞和/或胚胎玻璃化冷冻进行FP的BC患者。94例患者接受了COSTLES,83例采用标准促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案。评估回收的卵母细胞数量、卵母细胞成熟率、玻璃化冷冻的卵母细胞数量以及通过卵泡输出率(FORT)评估的卵泡对促卵泡激素的反应性。
两组女性在年龄和卵巢储备测试方面具有可比性,回收的卵母细胞数量相似(分别为13.1±10.0个和12.2±8.0个卵母细胞)。然而,与标准方案相比,COSTLES组的卵母细胞成熟率显著降低(分别为64.9±22.8%和77.4±19.3%,p<0.001)。结果,COSTLES组玻璃化冷冻的成熟卵母细胞数量较少(分别为7.8±5.3个和10.3±8.5个卵母细胞,p<0.001)。
尽管对促性腺激素释放激素类似物的反应相似,但与接受标准刺激方案的患者相比,接受COSTLES的BC患者卵母细胞成熟率降低。