• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为老年人提供更安全的车辆和技术。

Safer vehicles and technology for older adults.

机构信息

Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

School of Population and Global Public Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S176-S179. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1661712. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2019.1661712
PMID:31674855
Abstract

The objective of this study was to address the uptake of safer vehicles and in-vehicle technologies among older adults through a better understanding of extent and use of safer vehicles and awareness/acceptance of new vehicle technologies. Data were collected from a sample of 501 active older drivers (those who drove at least once a week) through telephone surveys. The sample included experienced and active drivers aged between 65 and 92 years (median 73 years). Though two-thirds indicated that safety was a priority in their vehicle choice, other factors such as reliability and vehicle make were more important. There was low awareness of driver assist safety features, particularly among the oldest drivers. Only one-quarter of drivers were receptive to paying extra for safety features, and there was no interest in paying more for driverless vehicles. The findings showed an overall low awareness and acceptance of in-vehicle safety features; however, where there was some awareness, there was greater interest in purchasing vehicles with safety features. More effort should be undertaken to develop and prioritize a set of recommendations to increase use of safe vehicles by older drivers.

摘要

本研究旨在通过更好地了解老年人对更安全车辆和车内技术的使用情况,以及对新车辆技术的认知/接受程度,来提高老年人对更安全车辆的接受度。通过电话调查,从 501 名活跃的老年司机(每周至少开车一次的司机)中收集了数据。样本包括年龄在 65 岁至 92 岁之间的有经验和活跃的司机(中位数为 73 岁)。尽管三分之二的人表示安全是他们选择车辆的首要考虑因素,但其他因素,如可靠性和车辆品牌,更为重要。司机辅助安全功能的认知度较低,尤其是在最年长的司机中。只有四分之一的司机愿意为安全功能额外付费,而且对无人驾驶车辆没有兴趣。研究结果表明,整体上对车内安全功能的认知度和接受度较低;然而,在有一定认知度的情况下,对购买具有安全功能的车辆的兴趣更大。应该投入更多的努力来制定和优先考虑一系列建议,以增加老年司机对安全车辆的使用。

相似文献

1
Safer vehicles and technology for older adults.为老年人提供更安全的车辆和技术。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S176-S179. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1661712. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
2
Vehicle safety characteristics in vulnerable driver populations.弱势驾驶员群体的车辆安全特征。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S54-S59. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1805445. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
3
Antilock braking system effectiveness in prevention of road traffic crashes in Iran.防抱死制动系统在伊朗预防道路交通事故中的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 4;13:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-439.
4
It cannot be all about safety: the benefits of prolonged mobility.这不可能仅仅关乎安全性:长期保持活动能力的益处。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Aug;9(4):367-78. doi: 10.1080/15389580801895285.
5
Truck drivers' opinion on road safety in Tanzania--a questionnaire study.坦桑尼亚卡车司机对道路安全的看法——一项问卷调查研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(1):103-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.671982.
6
Is a flick-through enough? A content analysis of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) user manuals.仅仅快速浏览一下就足够了吗?对高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)用户手册的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0252688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252688. eCollection 2021.
7
Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.全国严重车祸样本中高龄驾驶员的关键错误。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle adaptations among older drivers.老年驾驶员对车载技术和车辆改装的流行程度、态度和认知。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.2011 年款道奇和吉普车主在使用防撞和相关技术方面的体验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:298-303. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936408.
10
Type, size and age of vehicles driven by teenage drivers killed in crashes during 2008-2012.2008年至2012年期间在车祸中丧生的青少年驾驶员所驾驶车辆的类型、尺寸和年份。
Inj Prev. 2015 Apr;21(2):133-6. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041401. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of Self-Driving Vehicles in an Aging Population.自动驾驶车辆在老年人群体中的应用。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 28;9:e66180. doi: 10.2196/66180.
2
Preferred Sources of Information, Knowledge, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Systems: Effects of Gender and Age.自动化车辆系统信息、知识的首选来源及接受度:性别与年龄的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:806552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806552. eCollection 2022.
3
Attitudes Toward Four Levels of Self-Driving Technology Among Elderly Drivers.老年驾驶员对四级自动驾驶技术的态度。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:682973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682973. eCollection 2021.
4
Use of technology and social media in dementia care: Current and future directions.痴呆症护理中技术与社交媒体的应用:现状与未来方向。
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 19;11(4):109-123. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i4.109.