First Trimester Mean Arterial Pressure Measured Manually Versus Using an Automated Device and the Prediction of Preeclampsia: A Case-Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

First trimester mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) can be used to predict preeclampsia. This study aimed to compare the performance of first trimester MAP measured with an automated device using a standardized technique versus MAP taken manually in a typical clinical setting.

METHODS

A case-cohort study niched into a prospective cohort of pregnant women recruited at 11-14 weeks was performed. MAP was measured with an automated device on both arms until stability was reached. These results were compared with the MAP measured with a manual device at the closest medical visit (between 10 and 15 weeks gestation) and noted in the medical charts. Receiver-operator characteristics curve analyses were used to estimate the predictive values of MAP measured by both techniques.

RESULTS

Forty-one women with preeclampsia and 167 control patients were used for the comparisons. MAP measured with an automated device decreased significantly between 11 and 14 weeks gestation (P < 0.001). Moreover, MAP measured with an automated device was a better predictor of preeclampsia (area under the curve 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.79) than MAP measured with a manual device in a clinical setting (area under the curve 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.70). Taken alone, MAP measured with an automated device was associated with a detection rate of preeclampsia of 34%, for a false-positive rate of 10%.

CONCLUSION

First trimester MAP can predict preeclampsia. This study demonstrated that MAP measured with an automated device using a standardized technique is a better predictor than MAP measured with a manual device.