• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植术后患者的生存状况略有改善:器官共享联合网络注册中心的时间分析。

Marginal Improvement in Survival Post-Heart Transplantation in Patients With Prior Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Temporal Analysis of United Network of Organ Sharing Registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Feb;34(2):392-400. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.003
PMID:31679997
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An increasing number of patients undergoing heart transplantation are being bridged with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) LVAD has improved wait list survival remarkably. Historically, post-heart transplantation survival in BTT-LVAD patients, however, has remained inferior to that of primary heart transplantation. The authors hypothesized that in the modern era, the difference between post-heart transplantation survival in BTT-LVAD versus primary heart transplantation should be reduced. The objective of the present study was to determine whether there has been a change in survival after heart transplantation in patients with prior LVAD. The present study's cohort was compared with a historical cohort using the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1995 to 2004. DESIGN: Retrospective observational analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing database.

SETTINGS

Registry-based, observational, retrospective.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing adult orthotopic heart transplantation, excluding redo transplantation and multiorgan transplantations.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From the UNOS database, 22,065 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, were analyzed. Of these, 7,008 (31.76%) patients had prior LVAD (BTT-LVAD). Data analysis was performed with R software (Version 3.5.1) for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) modeling to identify variables influencing survival. For patients with prior LVAD, the overall HR was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.24) for survival. An HR of 3.22 (95% CI 2.23-4.68) for death in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-transplantation and an HR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.90) for survival in patients whose procedures were performed in high-volume centers performing more than 35 transplantations per year were identified.

CONCLUSION

Reduced survival in patients who received an LVAD before heart transplantation persists. However, there may have been a slight improvement in the HR for survival in the study cohort in the recent decade compared with the historical cohort from previous decades. It is intriguing that despite the paramount advances in both technology and clinical practice of LVAD, relatively minor survival benefit, if any, has occurred in post-heart transplantation for patients bridged with prior LVAD.

摘要

目的

越来越多接受心脏移植的患者采用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)桥接。桥接移植(BTT)LVAD 显著提高了移植等待名单上的存活率。然而,历史上,BTT-LVAD 患者心脏移植后的存活率仍低于初次心脏移植。作者假设,在现代,BTT-LVAD 与初次心脏移植后患者的存活率差异应有所缩小。本研究的目的是确定在接受 LVAD 桥接治疗的患者中,心脏移植后的生存率是否发生了变化。本研究队列与使用 1995 年至 2004 年美国器官共享网络(UNOS)数据库的历史队列进行了比较。

设计

对 UNOS 数据库中的数据进行回顾性观察性分析。

地点

基于注册的观察性回顾性研究。

参与者

接受成人原位心脏移植的患者,不包括再次移植和多器官移植。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

从 UNOS 数据库中分析了 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间接受心脏移植的 22065 名患者。其中,7008 名(31.76%)患者有既往 LVAD(BTT-LVAD)病史。使用 R 软件(版本 3.5.1)进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 比例风险比(HR)建模,以确定影响生存的变量。对于有既往 LVAD 病史的患者,整体 HR 为 1.15(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.07-1.24)。移植后接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的患者死亡的 HR 为 3.22(95%CI 2.23-4.68),而在每年进行超过 35 例移植的大容量中心进行手术的患者的 HR 为 0.72(95%CI 0.58-0.90)。

结论

接受心脏移植前接受 LVAD 治疗的患者生存率降低。然而,与前几十年的历史队列相比,在最近十年的研究队列中,生存率的 HR 可能略有改善。有趣的是,尽管 LVAD 的技术和临床实践都取得了重大进展,但接受 BTT-LVAD 桥接治疗的患者在心脏移植后,生存率仅略有提高(如果有的话)。

相似文献

1
Marginal Improvement in Survival Post-Heart Transplantation in Patients With Prior Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Temporal Analysis of United Network of Organ Sharing Registry.心脏移植术后患者的生存状况略有改善:器官共享联合网络注册中心的时间分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Feb;34(2):392-400. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
2
Should patients 60 years and older undergo bridge to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices?60 岁及以上的患者是否应该通过持续血流左心室辅助装置进行桥接移植?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):2017-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
3
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Survival on the heart transplant waiting list: impact of continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplant.心脏移植等待名单上的存活率:连续流动左心室辅助装置作为移植桥的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.019. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality.连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接移植对移植后死亡率的影响。
Circulation. 2019 Aug 6;140(6):459-469. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036932. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Comparison of total artificial heart and biventricular assist device support as bridge-to-transplantation.作为移植桥梁的全人工心脏与双心室辅助装置支持的比较。
J Card Surg. 2016 Oct;31(10):648-653. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12823. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Institutional volume of heart transplantation with left ventricular assist device explantation influences graft survival.心脏移植联合左心室辅助装置取出术的机构手术量影响移植物存活。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Sep;33(9):931-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 15.
8
Early Outcomes With Marginal Donor Hearts Compared With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭患者中边缘供体心脏与左心室辅助装置支持的早期结局比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;100(2):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.089. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
9
The role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients bridged to transplantation with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: A propensity score matched analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器在使用连续血流左心室辅助装置过渡到移植的患者中的作用:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jun;36(6):633-639. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Right and left ventricular assist devices are an option for bridge to heart transplant.左右心室辅助装置是心脏移植过渡的一种选择。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jan 22;9:146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.007. eCollection 2022 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: Management in the emergency department.连续流左心室辅助装置:急诊科的管理
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 11;1(4):362-370. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12178. eCollection 2020 Aug.