Thomas J D, Wilkins G T, Choong C Y, Abascal V M, Palacios I F, Block P C, Weyman A E
Noninvasive Cardiac Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
Circulation. 1988 Oct;78(4):980-93. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.78.4.980.
Mitral pressure half-time (T1/2) is widely used as an independent measure of mitral valve area in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvotomy. However, fluid dynamics theory predicts T1/2 to be strongly dependent on chamber compliance and the peak transmitral gradient, which are variables that change dramatically with valvotomy. These theoretical predictions were tested in an in vitro model of the left heart where valve area, chamber compliance, and initial gradient were independently adjusted. Measured T1/2 was observed to vary inversely with orifice area and directly with net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial pressure gradient. Theoretical predictions of T1/2 agreed with observed values with r = 0.998. To test this theory in vivo, the hemodynamic tracings of 18 patients undergoing mitral valvotomy were reviewed. Predictions were made for T1/2 assuming dependence only on valve area; these showed some correlations before valvotomy (r = 0.48-0.64, p less than 0.05) but none after valvotomy (r = 0.05-0.28, p = NS). Predictions for T1/2 based on the theoretical derivation (and thus including compliance and pressure in their calculation) were much better: before valvotomy, r = 0.93-0.96, p less than 0.0001; after valvotomy, r = 0.52-0.66, p less than 0.05. These data indicate that T1/2 is not an independent inverse measure of mitral valve area but is also directly proportional to net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial transmitral gradient. These other factors render T1/2 an unreliable measure of mitral valve area in the setting of acute mitral valvotomy.
二尖瓣压力减半时间(T1/2)被广泛用作经皮二尖瓣切开术患者二尖瓣面积的独立测量指标。然而,流体动力学理论预测T1/2强烈依赖于心腔顺应性和跨二尖瓣峰值梯度,而这些变量会随着瓣膜切开术而发生显著变化。在左心体外模型中对这些理论预测进行了测试,在该模型中瓣膜面积、心腔顺应性和初始梯度是独立调节的。观察到测量的T1/2与孔口面积成反比,与净心腔顺应性和初始压力梯度的平方根成正比。T1/2的理论预测与观察值相符,r = 0.998。为了在体内验证该理论,回顾了18例接受二尖瓣切开术患者的血流动力学记录。仅假设T1/2依赖于瓣膜面积进行预测;这些预测在瓣膜切开术前显示出一些相关性(r = 0.48 - 0.64,p < 0.05),但在瓣膜切开术后无相关性(r = 0.05 - 0.28,p = 无显著性差异)。基于理论推导(因此在计算中包括顺应性和压力)的T1/2预测要好得多:瓣膜切开术前,r = 0.93 - 0.96,p < 0.0001;瓣膜切开术后,r = 0.52 - 0.66,p < 0.05。这些数据表明,T1/2不是二尖瓣面积的独立反比测量指标,而是也与净心腔顺应性和初始跨二尖瓣梯度的平方根成正比。在急性二尖瓣切开术的情况下,这些其他因素使得T1/2成为二尖瓣面积的不可靠测量指标。