Hubert Arnaud, Galli Elena, Leurent Guillaume, Corbineau Hervé, Auriane Bidaut, Guillaume L'official, Leclercq Christophe, Donal Erwan
CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Echocardiography. 2019 Nov;36(11):2010-2018. doi: 10.1111/echo.14523. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with poor outcome in systolic heart failure (HF) patients. Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) in Mitra-Fr study failed to prove any beneficial effect over optimal medical treatment (OMT) but win in COAPT study. Nevertheless, little is known about the effect of PMVR on LV performance and mechanics in HF patients with severe secondary MR.
Thirty-seven patients with severe FMR undergoing PMVR were included and compared (according to indices of LV myocardial function and the relationship between LV-size and the degree of regurgitation) to nineteen patients with FMR treated by OMT. Both groups were clinically comparable. At 6-month follow-up, cardiac index such as LV global constructive work (GCW) improved significantly in both groups (1.86 vs 2.13 L/min/m , P = .02, 1.73 vs 2.28 L/min/m P = .002 and 977 vs 1101 mm Hg.%, P = .003, 967 vs 1110 mm Hg.%, P = .002 for PMVR and OMT groups, respectively) whereas left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume index, LV ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain were not different. Receiver operating characteristics in PMVR with LVEF ≤ 35% subgroup analysis demonstrated that global work index (GWI) had the best ability to identify patients with worse evolution (AUC = 0.882; P = .009), confirmed by univariable logistic regression, particularly for patients with GWI < 482 mm Hg.%.
Echocardiographic characteristics at 6-month follow-up are not different when compare PMVR and OMT for HF patients with severe FMR. A low global work index might be a tool for discouraging the implantation of clips for this indication.
功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)与收缩性心力衰竭(HF)患者的不良预后相关。Mitra-Fr研究中的经皮缘对缘二尖瓣修复术(PMVR)未能证明其比最佳药物治疗(OMT)有任何有益效果,但在COAPT研究中取得了成功。然而,对于PMVR对重度继发性二尖瓣反流HF患者左心室(LV)功能和力学的影响知之甚少。
纳入37例接受PMVR的重度FMR患者,并与19例接受OMT治疗的FMR患者进行比较(根据LV心肌功能指标以及LV大小与反流程度之间的关系)。两组在临床方面具有可比性。在6个月的随访中,两组的心脏指数如LV整体建设性功(GCW)均显著改善(PMVR组和OMT组分别为1.86 vs 2.13 L/min/m²,P = 0.02;1.73 vs 2.28 L/min/m²,P = 0.002;977 vs 1101 mmHg.%,P = 0.003;967 vs 1110 mmHg.%,P = 0.002),而左心室(LV)收缩末期容积指数、LV射血分数和整体纵向应变无差异。对LVEF≤35%亚组的PMVR患者进行受试者工作特征分析表明,整体功指数(GWI)识别病情恶化患者的能力最佳(AUC = 0.882;P = 0.009),单因素逻辑回归证实了这一点,特别是对于GWI < 482 mmHg.%的患者。
对于重度FMR的HF患者,比较PMVR和OMT时,6个月随访时的超声心动图特征无差异。低整体功指数可能是不鼓励针对该适应症植入夹子的一个指标。