Suppr超能文献

二尖瓣反流患者中Mitraclip与药物治疗或手术治疗的比较:通过个体患者数据重建确定的长期结果

Mitraclip Versus Medical Therapy or Surgery in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation: Long-Term Outcomes Determined by the Reconstruction of Individual Patient Data.

作者信息

Messori Andrea, Fadda Valeria, Rivano Melania, Trippoli Sabrina

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Regione Toscana, Florence, ITA.

Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ente di Supporto Tecnico Amministrativo Regionale (ESTAR), Florence, ITA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 May 13;16(5):e60204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60204. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

Although MitraClip has been studied in numerous trials, its evidence in the long term is based on a few original studies. We used an original technique of evidence synthesis to review long-term comparative trials evaluating MitraClip. We searched the PubMed database to select long-term comparative trials of MitraClip. The endpoint was all-cause mortality (minimum follow-up, one year). Included trials were analyzed using the IPDfromKM (reconstruct Individual Patient Data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves) method to reconstruct individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves. Standard survival statistics were used to interpret these long-term efficacy data. The survival benefit per patient was estimated from the restricted mean survival time (RMST). Six comparative studies of MitraClip were included; 973 patients were treated with MitraClip (six arms), 717 with medical therapy (five arms), and 80 with surgical repair or replacement (one arm). In our main analysis, the outcomes observed in patients treated with MitraClip were significantly better than those of medical therapy (hazard ratio for all-cause mortality, 0.5276; 95% confidence interval, 0.4412 to 0.6309; p < 0.001); the number of patients treated with surgery was too small to make reliable comparisons. Median survival was 30.4 months for medical therapy versus not reached for the other two groups. RMST was 43.931 and 33.756 months for MitraClip and controls, respectively, yielding a gain per patient of 10.17 months (95% confidence interval, 7.47 to 12.88). In our simplified cost-effectiveness evaluation, a gain of approximately 10 months per patient compared favorably with the device cost. Our analysis provided an original interpretation of the long-term evidence available on MitraClip.

摘要

尽管MitraClip已在众多试验中得到研究,但其长期证据仅基于少数原始研究。我们采用一种原始的证据综合技术来回顾评估MitraClip的长期对比试验。我们检索了PubMed数据库以选择MitraClip的长期对比试验。终点指标为全因死亡率(最短随访时间为一年)。纳入的试验采用IPDfromKM(从已发表的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线重建个体患者数据)方法进行分析,以从Kaplan-Meier曲线重建个体患者数据。使用标准生存统计方法来解读这些长期疗效数据。根据受限平均生存时间(RMST)估算每位患者的生存获益。纳入了六项MitraClip的对比研究;973例患者接受了MitraClip治疗(六个组),717例接受药物治疗(五个组),80例接受手术修复或置换(一个组)。在我们的主要分析中,接受MitraClip治疗的患者观察到的结局显著优于药物治疗(全因死亡率的风险比为0.5276;95%置信区间为0.4412至0.6309;p<0.001);接受手术治疗的患者数量过少,无法进行可靠比较。药物治疗的中位生存期为30.4个月,而其他两组未达到。MitraClip组和对照组的RMST分别为43.931个月和33.756个月,每位患者的获益为10.17个月(95%置信区间为7.47至12.88)。在我们简化的成本效益评估中,每位患者约10个月的获益与器械成本相比具有优势。我们的分析对MitraClip现有的长期证据提供了独到的解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2c/11093151/cdc6f2cb1c03/cureus-0016-00000060204-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验