Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Orthopedic Associates, KentuckyOne Health Medical Group, Louisville, Kentucky.
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):705-711. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700840. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Peripheral nerve blocks such as a femoral + sciatic block have demonstrated significant pain relief following TKA. However, these nerve blocks have residual motor deficits which prevent immediate postoperative ambulation. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing primary TKA with femoral and sciatic (Fem + Sci) motor nerve blocks versus an adductor canal and the interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee and adductor canal block (IPACK + ACB) sensory nerve blocks. A total of 100 consecutive patients were reviewed, 50 received Fem + Sci nerve blocks and 50 received IPACK + ACB blocks preoperatively. There were no differences in the two groups with respect to surgical technique, implant type, postoperative pain, and physical therapy protocols. Differences in opioid requirements, length of stay (LOS), distance walked, and common knee scoring systems were analyzed. Among them, 62% IPACK + ACB patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 compared with 14% in the Fem + Sci group ( < 0.0001). The IPACK + ACB patients had a shorter LOS (mean 1.48 days vs. 2.02 days, < 0.001), ambulated further on postoperative day 0 (mean 21.4 feet vs. 5.3 feet, < 0.001), and required less narcotics the day after surgery (mean, 15.7 vs. 24.0 morphine equivalents < 0.0001) and at 2 weeks (mean, 6.2 vs. 9.3 morphine equivalents, = 0.025). The use of this combination IPACK and ACB demonstrated improved early ambulation with a decrease in opioid use and length of stay compared with a femoral and sciatic motor nerve block in patients undergoing primary TKA.
周围神经阻滞,如股神经+坐骨神经阻滞,在 TKA 后已被证实具有显著的止痛效果。然而,这些神经阻滞仍存在运动功能障碍,从而妨碍术后即刻的活动。本研究旨在比较接受初次 TKA 的患者接受股神经+坐骨神经(Fem+Sci)运动神经阻滞与收肌管和腘动脉与后膝囊和收肌管之间间隙阻滞(IPACK+ACB)感觉神经阻滞的效果。共回顾了 100 例连续患者,其中 50 例接受了 Fem+Sci 神经阻滞,50 例接受了术前的 IPACK+ACB 阻滞。两组在手术技术、植入物类型、术后疼痛和物理治疗方案方面无差异。分析了两组在阿片类药物需求、住院时间(LOS)、行走距离和常见膝关节评分系统方面的差异。其中,62%的 IPACK+ACB 患者在术后第 1 天出院,而 Fem+Sci 组仅为 14%( < 0.0001)。IPACK+ACB 患者的 LOS 更短(平均 1.48 天比 2.02 天, < 0.001),术后第 0 天行走距离更远(平均 21.4 英尺比 5.3 英尺, < 0.001),术后第 1 天和第 2 周阿片类药物需求更少(平均,15.7 比 24.0 吗啡当量, < 0.0001)和第 2 周(平均,6.2 比 9.3 吗啡当量, = 0.025)。与股神经+坐骨神经运动神经阻滞相比,该联合 IPACK 和 ACB 的使用在初次 TKA 患者中表现出了更好的早期活动能力,减少了阿片类药物的使用和 LOS。