• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术后使用 IPACK 和收肌管神经阻滞减少阿片类药物消耗和住院时间。

Decreased Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay Using an IPACK and Adductor Canal Nerve Block following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Orthopedic Associates, KentuckyOne Health Medical Group, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):705-711. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700840. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1700840
PMID:31683348
Abstract

Peripheral nerve blocks such as a femoral + sciatic block have demonstrated significant pain relief following TKA. However, these nerve blocks have residual motor deficits which prevent immediate postoperative ambulation. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing primary TKA with femoral and sciatic (Fem + Sci) motor nerve blocks versus an adductor canal and the interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee and adductor canal block (IPACK + ACB) sensory nerve blocks. A total of 100 consecutive patients were reviewed, 50 received Fem + Sci nerve blocks and 50 received IPACK + ACB blocks preoperatively. There were no differences in the two groups with respect to surgical technique, implant type, postoperative pain, and physical therapy protocols. Differences in opioid requirements, length of stay (LOS), distance walked, and common knee scoring systems were analyzed. Among them, 62% IPACK + ACB patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 compared with 14% in the Fem + Sci group ( < 0.0001). The IPACK + ACB patients had a shorter LOS (mean 1.48 days vs. 2.02 days,  < 0.001), ambulated further on postoperative day 0 (mean 21.4 feet vs. 5.3 feet,  < 0.001), and required less narcotics the day after surgery (mean, 15.7 vs. 24.0 morphine equivalents  < 0.0001) and at 2 weeks (mean, 6.2 vs. 9.3 morphine equivalents,  = 0.025). The use of this combination IPACK and ACB demonstrated improved early ambulation with a decrease in opioid use and length of stay compared with a femoral and sciatic motor nerve block in patients undergoing primary TKA.

摘要

周围神经阻滞,如股神经+坐骨神经阻滞,在 TKA 后已被证实具有显著的止痛效果。然而,这些神经阻滞仍存在运动功能障碍,从而妨碍术后即刻的活动。本研究旨在比较接受初次 TKA 的患者接受股神经+坐骨神经(Fem+Sci)运动神经阻滞与收肌管和腘动脉与后膝囊和收肌管之间间隙阻滞(IPACK+ACB)感觉神经阻滞的效果。共回顾了 100 例连续患者,其中 50 例接受了 Fem+Sci 神经阻滞,50 例接受了术前的 IPACK+ACB 阻滞。两组在手术技术、植入物类型、术后疼痛和物理治疗方案方面无差异。分析了两组在阿片类药物需求、住院时间(LOS)、行走距离和常见膝关节评分系统方面的差异。其中,62%的 IPACK+ACB 患者在术后第 1 天出院,而 Fem+Sci 组仅为 14%( < 0.0001)。IPACK+ACB 患者的 LOS 更短(平均 1.48 天比 2.02 天, < 0.001),术后第 0 天行走距离更远(平均 21.4 英尺比 5.3 英尺, < 0.001),术后第 1 天和第 2 周阿片类药物需求更少(平均,15.7 比 24.0 吗啡当量, < 0.0001)和第 2 周(平均,6.2 比 9.3 吗啡当量, = 0.025)。与股神经+坐骨神经运动神经阻滞相比,该联合 IPACK 和 ACB 的使用在初次 TKA 患者中表现出了更好的早期活动能力,减少了阿片类药物的使用和 LOS。

相似文献

1
Decreased Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay Using an IPACK and Adductor Canal Nerve Block following Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后使用 IPACK 和收肌管神经阻滞减少阿片类药物消耗和住院时间。
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):705-711. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700840. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
2
iPACK block (local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) added to the adductor canal blocks versus the adductor canal blocks in the pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.iPACK 阻滞(即隐动脉和后膝关节囊之间的间隙局部麻醉浸润)联合收肌管阻滞与单纯收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 12;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03272-5.
3
Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.连续收肌管阻滞优于单独收肌管阻滞或收肌管阻滞联合 IPACK 阻滞(腘动脉和膝关节后囊之间的间隙)在全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和活动:随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00682-8. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
4
Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与IPACK阻滞(腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙)联合单纯内收肌管阻滞的比较:术后即刻疼痛和膝关节功能的前瞻性对照试验
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Oct;28(7):1391-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Adductor Canal Block Combined with Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) versus Periarticular Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty.收肌管阻滞联合膝关节囊和胭窝(iPACK)与关节周围注射用于全膝关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):514-521. doi: 10.4055/cios21108. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Adductor Canal Block Combined With iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block vs Periarticular Injection for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.收肌管阻滞联合 iPACK(腘动脉和膝关节后囊间隙)阻滞与关节周围注射用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):122-129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.086. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Efficacy of adding infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) to adductor canal block and local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study.腘动脉与后膝关节囊之间(IPACK)浸润联合收肌管阻滞和局部浸润镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2024 May-Aug;32(2):10225536241265445. doi: 10.1177/10225536241265445.
8
What Is the Role of a Periarticular Injection for Knee Arthroplasty Patients Receiving a Multimodal Analgesia Regimen Incorporating Adductor Canal and Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee Blocks? A Randomized Blinded Placebo-Controlled Noninferiority Trial.膝关节置换术后多模式镇痛方案中包含收肌管阻滞和膝关节囊下隐窝浸润,关节周围注射的作用是什么?一项随机、盲法、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1163-1172. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006805. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
9
Addition of Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee and Adductor Canal Block to Periarticular Injection Enhances Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.在膝关节后囊和收肌管的腘动脉周围浸润与关节周围注射联合应用可增强全膝关节置换术后的疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):526-535. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003794.
10
Efficacy of Two Unique Combinations of Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.两种独特的神经阻滞联合方案对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3421-3431. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous Adductor Canal Block Compared to Epidural Anesthesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中连续收肌管阻滞与硬膜外麻醉的比较。
J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 13;17:3729-3740. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S462079. eCollection 2024.
2
Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department.超声引导下在急诊科进行神经阻滞的并发症发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444742. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742.
3
Comparing Different Multimodal Analgesia Protocols for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
比较初次全膝关节置换术的不同多模式镇痛方案——一项回顾性队列分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 12;13(14):4079. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144079.
4
Is a Rapid Recovery Protocol for THA and TKA Associated With Decreased 90-day Complications, Opioid Use, and Readmissions in a Health Safety-net Hospital?THA 和 TKA 的快速康复方案是否与降低卫生保障医院 90 天内并发症、阿片类药物使用和再入院率有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1442-1451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003054. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
Chronic post-surgical pain after knee arthroplasty: a role of peripheral nerve blocks.膝关节置换术后的慢性术后疼痛:外周神经阻滞的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 11;10:1335405. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1335405. eCollection 2023.
6
Periarticular injection, iPACK block, and peripheral nerve block in pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a structured narrative review.全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理中的关节周围注射、iPACK阻滞和周围神经阻滞:一项结构化叙述性综述
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Nov 15;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00346-8.
7
Clinical effects of interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block with multimodal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多模式镇痛下单膝后囊与腘窝间隙阻滞对全膝关节置换术的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5815-5832. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04798-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
Adductor Canal Block Combined with Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) versus Periarticular Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty.收肌管阻滞联合膝关节囊和胭窝(iPACK)与关节周围注射用于全膝关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):514-521. doi: 10.4055/cios21108. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Comparison of analgesic consumption of hemophilic and non-hemophilic patients in knee arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后血友病与非血友病患者的镇痛药物消耗比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Nov;28(11):1616-1621. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.47482.
10
IPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block Combined with SACB (Single Adductor Canal Block) Versus SACB for Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty.腘窝(腘动脉与后膝关节囊之间)间隙阻滞联合单次收肌管阻滞与单纯单次收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Nov;14(11):2809-2821. doi: 10.1111/os.13263. Epub 2022 Sep 20.