Arthroscopy and Sports Injuries Unit, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petch-Tikva, Israel.
Department of Orthopedics, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):712-716. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700810. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Arthroscopic classification of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) morphology is fundamental for clinical studies on emerging techniques such as repair and preservation. At present, the most acknowledged classification is Crain description of four morphological patterns. The purpose of the study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver reliability of Crain classification in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. The study included 101 patients who had ACL reconstruction surgery between the years 2014 and 2017. The morphological pattern of ACL remnant scar formation during surgery was observed and classified according to Crain by three orthopaedic surgeons. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were measured using kappa statistics. Intraobserver reliability for the Crain classification ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 (substantial to almost perfect agreement). Interobserver reliability was 0.51 (moderate agreement). In almost a third of the cases, observers reported on additional morphological pattern of scar formation that was not well defined by Crain. A modified classification of four patterns was suggested: (A) without scar tissue, (B) with adhesion to the femoral notch (wall or roof), (C) with adhesion to the notch and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and (D) with adhesion to the PCL. Reanalysis of these four morphological configurations resulted in interobserver reliability of 0.82 (almost perfect agreement). In conclusion, the Crain classification of torn ACL remnant morphology has moderate interobserver reliability; however, a suggested classification with modified and additional configurations has almost perfect reliability and may be useful for studies on ACL repair and preservation.
关节镜下撕裂前交叉韧带 (ACL) 形态的分类对于新兴技术(如修复和保留)的临床研究至关重要。目前,最被认可的分类是 Crain 对四种形态模式的描述。本研究的目的是分析 Crain 分类在接受 ACL 重建手术的患者中的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。该研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年间接受 ACL 重建手术的 101 名患者。在手术过程中观察并根据 Crain 对 ACL 残端瘢痕形成的形态模式进行分类,由三名骨科医生进行分类。使用 Kappa 统计测量观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。Crain 分类的观察者内可靠性范围为 0.63 至 0.83(具有实质性至几乎完美的一致性)。观察者间可靠性为 0.51(中度一致性)。在近三分之一的病例中,观察者报告了 Crain 未明确定义的额外瘢痕形成形态模式。建议对四个模式进行改良分类:(A)无瘢痕组织,(B)与股骨切迹(壁或顶)粘连,(C)与切迹和后交叉韧带(PCL)粘连,(D)与 PCL 粘连。对这四种形态结构的重新分析得出观察者间可靠性为 0.82(几乎完美的一致性)。总之,撕裂 ACL 残端形态的 Crain 分类具有中度观察者间可靠性;然而,具有改良和额外配置的建议分类具有几乎完美的可靠性,并且可能对 ACL 修复和保留的研究有用。