• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带残端形态分类在手术中的可靠性。

The Reliability of Classifying the Morphology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants during Surgery.

机构信息

Arthroscopy and Sports Injuries Unit, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petch-Tikva, Israel.

Department of Orthopedics, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):712-716. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700810. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1700810
PMID:31683349
Abstract

Arthroscopic classification of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) morphology is fundamental for clinical studies on emerging techniques such as repair and preservation. At present, the most acknowledged classification is Crain description of four morphological patterns. The purpose of the study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver reliability of Crain classification in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. The study included 101 patients who had ACL reconstruction surgery between the years 2014 and 2017. The morphological pattern of ACL remnant scar formation during surgery was observed and classified according to Crain by three orthopaedic surgeons. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were measured using kappa statistics. Intraobserver reliability for the Crain classification ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 (substantial to almost perfect agreement). Interobserver reliability was 0.51 (moderate agreement). In almost a third of the cases, observers reported on additional morphological pattern of scar formation that was not well defined by Crain. A modified classification of four patterns was suggested: (A) without scar tissue, (B) with adhesion to the femoral notch (wall or roof), (C) with adhesion to the notch and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and (D) with adhesion to the PCL. Reanalysis of these four morphological configurations resulted in interobserver reliability of 0.82 (almost perfect agreement). In conclusion, the Crain classification of torn ACL remnant morphology has moderate interobserver reliability; however, a suggested classification with modified and additional configurations has almost perfect reliability and may be useful for studies on ACL repair and preservation.

摘要

关节镜下撕裂前交叉韧带 (ACL) 形态的分类对于新兴技术(如修复和保留)的临床研究至关重要。目前,最被认可的分类是 Crain 对四种形态模式的描述。本研究的目的是分析 Crain 分类在接受 ACL 重建手术的患者中的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。该研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年间接受 ACL 重建手术的 101 名患者。在手术过程中观察并根据 Crain 对 ACL 残端瘢痕形成的形态模式进行分类,由三名骨科医生进行分类。使用 Kappa 统计测量观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。Crain 分类的观察者内可靠性范围为 0.63 至 0.83(具有实质性至几乎完美的一致性)。观察者间可靠性为 0.51(中度一致性)。在近三分之一的病例中,观察者报告了 Crain 未明确定义的额外瘢痕形成形态模式。建议对四个模式进行改良分类:(A)无瘢痕组织,(B)与股骨切迹(壁或顶)粘连,(C)与切迹和后交叉韧带(PCL)粘连,(D)与 PCL 粘连。对这四种形态结构的重新分析得出观察者间可靠性为 0.82(几乎完美的一致性)。总之,撕裂 ACL 残端形态的 Crain 分类具有中度观察者间可靠性;然而,具有改良和额外配置的建议分类具有几乎完美的可靠性,并且可能对 ACL 修复和保留的研究有用。

相似文献

1
The Reliability of Classifying the Morphology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants during Surgery.前交叉韧带残端形态分类在手术中的可靠性。
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):712-716. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700810. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
2
The detached stump of the torn anterior cruciate ligament adheres to the femoral notch wall and then to the posterior cruciate ligament within 6 months from injury.从损伤后 6 个月开始,撕裂的前交叉韧带的游离残端开始附着于股骨髁切迹壁,然后附着于后交叉韧带。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2653-2658. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5293-8. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation.改良 Crain 分类在保留残端的前交叉韧带重建设计中的临床应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7.
4
Arthroscopy Up to Date: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy.最新关节镜检查:前交叉韧带解剖结构
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):209-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.10.009.
5
Reliability and reproducibility of several methods of arthroscopic assessment of femoral tunnel position during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.关节镜评估前交叉韧带重建中股骨隧道位置的几种方法的可靠性和可重复性。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Oct;30(10):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort.前交叉韧带重建失败原因的多评估者一致性:MARS队列的影像学和视频分析
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):310-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560880. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
The Influence of Ruptured Scar Pattern on the Healing Potential of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant Cells.破裂瘢痕模式对前交叉韧带残端细胞愈合潜能的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1382-1388. doi: 10.1177/0363546518755753. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Clinical and Arthroscopic Results After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.保留残余组织对解剖双束前交叉韧带重建术后临床及关节镜检查结果的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1882-92. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587713. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
9
Morphological and Histological Changes in the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament after Rupture.人前交叉韧带撕裂后的形态学和组织学变化。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Jan;23(1):33-37.
10
Reliability of estimates of ACL attachment locations in 3-dimensional knee reconstruction based on routine clinical MRI in pediatric patients.基于常规临床 MRI 对小儿患者膝关节重建中 ACL 附着位置的评估的可靠性。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1319-29. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482298. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation.改良 Crain 分类在保留残端的前交叉韧带重建设计中的临床应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7.
2
Sandwich-Style Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With In-Between Remnant Preservation.三明治式前交叉韧带重建:保留中间残端的双束前交叉韧带重建
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Mar 13;10(4):e1095-e1102. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.12.012. eCollection 2021 Apr.