Jensen V J, Hoffmann P, Nilsson T
Department of Abdominal Surgery, County Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Dan Med Bull. 1988 Jun;35(3):295-7.
In a randomised single-blind study, peroral intestinal cleansing was compared with rectal lavaging in 55 completed colonscopies. After rapid oral intake of 1.5 l cold (5-7 degrees C) electrolyte solution, a better cleansing of colon was observed than after rectal lavage. A majority of patients preferred this method. More than one hour per patient of the nurses' time was saved in the electrolyte solution group. The amount of electrolyte solution used was less than in previous studies. It did not result in undesirable fluid retention in the colon. No serious side effects were observed, and only minor changes in the patients' weight and plasma osmolality occurred in the electrolyte solution group.
在一项随机单盲研究中,对55例完成结肠镜检查的患者比较了口服肠道准备和直肠灌洗。在快速口服1.5升冷(5-7摄氏度)电解质溶液后,观察到结肠清洁效果优于直肠灌洗。大多数患者更喜欢这种方法。电解质溶液组每位患者节省了护士一个多小时的时间。所用电解质溶液的量比以前的研究少。它没有导致结肠中不必要的液体潴留。未观察到严重副作用,电解质溶液组患者的体重和血浆渗透压仅有轻微变化。