Suppr超能文献

基于模型的物种界定:合并物种是否具有生殖隔离?

Model-Based Species Delimitation: Are Coalescent Species Reproductively Isolated?

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2020 Jul 1;69(4):708-721. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz072.

Abstract

A large and growing fraction of systematists define species as independently evolving lineages that may be recognized by analyzing the population genetic history of alleles sampled from individuals belonging to those species. This has motivated the development of increasingly sophisticated statistical models rooted in the multispecies coalescent process. Specifically, these models allow for simultaneous estimation of the number of species present in a sample of individuals and the phylogenetic history of those species using only DNA sequence data from independent loci. These methods hold extraordinary promise for increasing the efficiency of species discovery but require extensive validation to ensure that they are accurate and precise. Whether the species identified by these methods correspond to the species that would be recognized by alternative species recognition criteria (such as measurements of reproductive isolation) is currently an open question and a subject of vigorous debate. Here, we perform an empirical test of these methods by making use of a classic model system in the history of speciation research, flies of the genus Drosophila. Specifically, we use the uniquely comprehensive data on reproductive isolation that is available for this system, along with DNA sequence data, to ask whether Drosophila species inferred under the multispecies coalescent model correspond to those recognized by many decades of speciation research. We found that coalescent based and reproductive isolation-based methods of inferring species boundaries are concordant for 77% of the species pairs. We explore and discuss potential explanations for these discrepancies. We also found that the amount of prezygotic isolation between two species is a strong predictor of the posterior probability of species boundaries based on DNA sequence data, regardless of whether the species pairs are sympatrically or allopatrically distributed. [BPP; Drosophila speciation; genetic distance; multispecies coalescent.].

摘要

越来越多的系统分类学家将物种定义为独立进化的谱系,可以通过分析来自属于这些物种的个体的等位基因的种群遗传历史来识别。这激发了越来越复杂的统计模型的发展,这些模型根植于多物种合并过程。具体来说,这些模型允许仅使用来自独立基因座的 DNA 序列数据同时估计样品中存在的物种数量和这些物种的系统发育历史。这些方法为提高物种发现效率提供了巨大的潜力,但需要广泛的验证,以确保它们准确和精确。这些方法识别的物种是否与通过替代物种识别标准(例如生殖隔离测量)识别的物种相对应,目前仍是一个悬而未决的问题,也是激烈争论的主题。在这里,我们利用物种形成研究历史中的经典模型系统果蝇属的苍蝇,通过实证检验这些方法。具体来说,我们利用该系统特有的关于生殖隔离的全面数据以及 DNA 序列数据,来询问多物种合并模型推断的果蝇物种是否与几十年来的物种形成研究所识别的物种相对应。我们发现,基于合并和基于生殖隔离的物种边界推断方法在 77%的物种对中是一致的。我们探讨并讨论了这些差异的潜在解释。我们还发现,两个物种之间的前合子隔离量是基于 DNA 序列数据推断物种边界的后验概率的强有力预测因子,无论物种对是同域分布还是异域分布。[BPP; 果蝇物种形成; 遗传距离; 多物种合并。]。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验