Montanari Vergallo Gianluca
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Medico-Legal and Orthopaedic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome Rome Italy.
Eur J Health Law. 2019 Nov 12;26(5):413-424. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12265439.
Forty years after the enactment of Law no. 194/78 that governs voluntary interruption of pregnancy, Italy has been experiencing difficulties guaranteeing that patients gain access to abortion procedures in a timely fashion. Conscientious objection detracts considerably from the very effectiveness of the law, as pointed out by major European institutions as well. Hence, the network of family planning and counselling centres needs to be expanded and supported; such institutions, in fact, may go a long way in ensuring that women make the best, informed decisions. The author has set out to deal with those issues by means of a comparative analysis. He believes that Italian lawmakers ought to follow in the footsteps of other European countries in order to balance the rights of objecting gynaecologists against those of women who choose to have an abortion, despite the relatively small number of doctors willing to carry out the procedure.
在管理自愿终止妊娠的第194/78号法律颁布40年后,意大利在确保患者及时获得堕胎程序方面一直面临困难。正如主要欧洲机构所指出的,出于良心拒绝对该法律的有效性造成了相当大的损害。因此,需要扩大和支持计划生育和咨询中心网络;事实上,这些机构在确保女性做出最佳的明智决定方面可以发挥很大作用。作者已着手通过比较分析来处理这些问题。他认为,意大利立法者应该效仿其他欧洲国家,以平衡持反对意见的妇科医生的权利与选择堕胎的女性的权利,尽管愿意实施该手术的医生数量相对较少。