文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

欧洲药品管理局政策 0070:学术研究中临床研究报告数据实用性的探索性评价。

European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research.

机构信息

Qualiance ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0836-3.


DOI:10.1186/s12874-019-0836-3
PMID:31690260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6833240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical study reports (CSRs) have been increasingly utilised within academic research in recent years. European Medicines Agency (EMA) Policy 0070 'Phase 1,' which came into effect in January 2015, requires the publication of regulatory documents such as CSRs from central applications in an anonymised format. EMA Policy 0070 requires sponsors to demonstrate careful consideration of data utility within anonymised CSRs published within the scope of the policy, yet the concept of data utility is not clearly defined in the associated anonymisation guidance. OBJECTIVE: To review the use of data from CSRs in published academic research and to hypothesise the potential data utility of CSRs anonymised under the objectives of EMA Policy 0070 for future academic research. METHODS: Review of the objectives, research methodologies and findings of academic research reports using unpublished data from CSRs (prior to EMA Policy 0070). Semi-structured interviews with authors of academic research reports, including questions related to data utility of anonymised CSRs published under EMA Policy 0070. RESULTS: Thirteen academic research reports were identified and reviewed. The research purposes ranged from assessment of reporting bias, comparison of methods and results with published data sources, detailed evaluation of harms and adverse events, re-analysis and novel analyses including systematic reviews and meta-analysis. All of the examples identified required access to the methods and results sections of CSRs (including aggregated summary tables) and research purposes relating to evaluation of adverse events also required access to participant narratives. Retaining anonymised participant narratives relating to interventions, findings and events, while maintaining an acceptably low risk of participant re-identification, may provide an important gain in data utility and further understanding of drug safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides an initial insight into the previous use of CSR data and current practices for including regulatory data in academic research. This work also provides early guidance to qualitatively assess and document data utility within anonymised CSRs published under EMA Policy 0070.

摘要

背景:近年来,临床研究报告(CSR)在学术研究中被越来越多地应用。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)于 2015 年 1 月生效的政策 0070“第 1 阶段”要求以匿名格式公布中央申请的监管文件,如 CSR。EMA 政策 0070 要求赞助商在政策范围内公布的匿名 CSR 中证明对数据实用性的谨慎考虑,但相关匿名指南中并未明确界定数据实用性的概念。

目的:审查 CSR 在已发表的学术研究中的使用情况,并假设根据 EMA 政策 0070 的目标对 CSR 进行匿名处理,对未来学术研究的潜在数据实用性。

方法:审查使用 CSR 中未发表数据的学术研究报告的目标、研究方法和发现(在 EMA 政策 0070 之前)。对使用 CSR 中未发表数据的学术研究报告的作者进行半结构化访谈,包括与 EMA 政策 0070 下公布的匿名 CSR 数据实用性相关的问题。

结果:确定并审查了 13 篇学术研究报告。研究目的范围从评估报告偏倚、与已发表数据来源的方法和结果进行比较、详细评估危害和不良事件、重新分析和新的分析,包括系统评价和荟萃分析。所有确定的例子都需要访问 CSR 的方法和结果部分(包括汇总摘要表),而与评估不良事件相关的研究目的还需要访问参与者叙述。保留与干预、发现和事件有关的匿名参与者叙述,同时将参与者重新识别的风险保持在可接受的低水平,可能会提高数据实用性并进一步了解药物安全概况。

结论:这项工作提供了对 CSR 数据的先前使用情况和将监管数据纳入学术研究的当前实践的初步见解。这项工作还为在 EMA 政策 0070 下公布的匿名 CSR 中定性评估和记录数据实用性提供了早期指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/6833240/5421819d9200/12874_2019_836_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/6833240/5421819d9200/12874_2019_836_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708a/6833240/5421819d9200/12874_2019_836_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019-11-5

[2]
Access to regulatory data from the European Medicines Agency: the times they are a-changing.

Syst Rev. 2012-10-30

[3]
The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors.

Syst Rev. 2018-8-8

[4]
Does access to clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency reduce reporting biases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients.

PLoS One. 2017-12-11

[5]
Reporting of harms in oncological clinical study reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency compared to trial registries and publications-a methodological review.

BMC Med. 2021-4-8

[6]
Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016-2018: a cross-sectional analysis.

BMJ Open. 2023-5-15

[7]
Assessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document Analysis.

PLoS Med. 2016-8-16

[8]
Accessibility of clinical study reports supporting medicine approvals: a cross-sectional evaluation.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024-3

[9]
Substantial delays in clinical data published by the European Medicines Agency - a cross sectional study.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022-6

[10]
Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data.

PLoS Med. 2013-10-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evaluating the Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Breast Cancer Clinical Trial Data Sets.

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023-9

[2]
How to use the regulatory data from Health Canada for secondary analyses on new drugs, biologics and vaccines.

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024-5-22

[3]
Clinical Trial Data Transparency in the EU: Is the New Clinical Trials Regulation a Game-Changer?

IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law. 2023

[4]
Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016-2018: a cross-sectional analysis.

BMJ Open. 2023-5-15

[5]
Practical Considerations and Challenges When Conducting an Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Methods Mol Biol. 2022

[6]
Benefits and harms of Risperidone and Paliperidone for treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis involving individual participant data and clinical study reports.

BMC Med. 2021-8-25

[7]
Can synthetic data be a proxy for real clinical trial data? A validation study.

BMJ Open. 2021-4-16

[8]
Optimizing the synthesis of clinical trial data using sequential trees.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021-1-15

[9]
Evaluating the re-identification risk of a clinical study report anonymized under EMA Policy 0070 and Health Canada Regulations.

Trials. 2020-2-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews.

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018-10-11

[2]
The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors.

Syst Rev. 2018-8-8

[3]
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-9

[4]
Considering benefits and harms of duloxetine for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of clinical study reports.

CMAJ. 2017-2-6

[5]
Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-9-6

[6]
Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials.

Trials. 2016-4-22

[7]
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence.

BMJ. 2015-9-16

[8]
Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.

BMJ. 2015-2-26

[9]
Transparency and the European Medicines Agency--sharing of clinical trial data.

N Engl J Med. 2014-12-25

[10]
Coding of adverse events of suicidality in clinical study reports of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: descriptive study.

BMJ. 2014-6-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索