• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[闭集言语测听试验的特征:听力数据记录、辨别功能与可重复性]

[Characterization of a closed-set logatome test : Documentation of audiometric data: discrimination function and reproducibility].

作者信息

Hörmann L, Ambrosch P, Hey M

机构信息

Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 27, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.

出版信息

HNO. 2020 Jan;68(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00771-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-019-00771-6
PMID:31690970
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Logatomes, nonsensical combinations of consonants and vowels, are suitable for a precise capture and analysis of individual phonemes as fundamental modules of speech in audiometric diagnostics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to capture the audiometric characteristics of a closed-set logatome test. The slope of the discrimination function at the speech reception threshold (SRT) and the reproducibility were analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A set of 102 intensity varied and randomized logatomes were presented in the form of consonant-vowel-consonant to 25 hearing unimpaired adults. The measurements were performed in a free field setting and were each repeated after a 2-week interval. The subjects were requested to repeat the heard logatome in a closed response test of 10 items per sound item on a touchscreen.

RESULTS

The slope of the mean discrimination function at the SRT was on average 4%/dB; however, the mean discrimination function slope was steeper for the initial consonant than for the final one. The differences of the test and retest results at the SRT showed a standard deviation of 13% for consonants. These differences were normally distributed. There were no significant differences between test and retest.

CONCLUSION

The slope of the discrimination function at the SRT appeared to be shallow but was comparable to established word tests. Finally, there was no evidence of a learning effect in the retest, which emphasizes the low redundancy of the speech material and makes it an attractive complementary option to routine audiometric diagnostics.

摘要

背景

无意义音节,即辅音和元音的无意义组合,适合在听力诊断中作为语音基本模块精确捕捉和分析单个音素。

目的

这项前瞻性研究的目的是捕捉封闭式无意义音节测试的听力特征。分析了言语接受阈(SRT)处辨别函数的斜率和可重复性。

材料与方法

以辅音-元音-辅音的形式向25名听力正常的成年人呈现一组102个强度变化且随机排列的无意义音节。测量在自由声场环境中进行,每隔2周重复一次。要求受试者在触摸屏上对每个声音项目进行10项的封闭式反应测试中重复听到的无意义音节。

结果

SRT处平均辨别函数的斜率平均为4%/dB;然而,初始辅音的平均辨别函数斜率比最终辅音的更陡。SRT处测试和复测结果的差异显示辅音的标准差为13%。这些差异呈正态分布。测试和复测之间无显著差异。

结论

SRT处辨别函数的斜率似乎较平缓,但与既定的单词测试相当。最后,复测中没有学习效应的证据,这强调了语音材料的低冗余性,使其成为常规听力诊断的一个有吸引力的补充选项。

相似文献

1
[Characterization of a closed-set logatome test : Documentation of audiometric data: discrimination function and reproducibility].[闭集言语测听试验的特征:听力数据记录、辨别功能与可重复性]
HNO. 2020 Jan;68(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00771-6.
2
[Speech audiometry with logatomes].[使用言语单位的言语测听法]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1997 Feb;76(2):57-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997389.
3
Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.言语测听法中的一些方法学方面
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1984;21:1-25.
4
Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children.安静条件下的言语测听与奥登堡儿童句子测试。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Mar;51(3):157-63. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.633935. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
5
Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
Br J Audiol. 1994 Jun;28(3):165-79. doi: 10.3109/03005369409086564.
6
Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.不同儿童助听器验配方案的比较。
Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):20-31. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000460.
7
Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.土耳其语矩阵句子测试的开发与评估
Int J Audiol. 2015;54 Suppl 2:51-61. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
8
Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.噪声环境下矩阵句子测试的研究:人工耳蜗植入患者的可重复性和辨别功能
Int J Audiol. 2014 Dec;53(12):895-902. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.938368. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
Scand Audiol. 1984;13(1):57-63. doi: 10.3109/01050398409076258.
10
Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment.对头带式骨锚式助听器、测试带式骨锚式助听器以及“卡扣式”基台所获得的听力学结果进行比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jan;30(1):70-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818be97a.

本文引用的文献

1
[Current Audiological Diagnostics].[当前听力学诊断]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(S 01):S4-S42. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120339. Epub 2017 May 12.
2
[Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].[用于传统和植入式助听器指征的言语测听法]
HNO. 2017 Mar;65(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0291-y.
3
[Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].[弗莱堡单音节语音测试中测试列表的感知等效性评估]
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):572-83. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0192-0.
4
[Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].[弗莱堡单音节言语测试的重测信度]
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):564-71. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0166-2.
5
Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model.利用听觉模型预测正常和听力受损听众在安静环境下的辅音识别能力。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1506-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4864293.
6
[Contribution to the discussion surrounding the Freiburg speech test].[对弗莱堡言语测试相关讨论的贡献]
HNO. 2014 Jan;62(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2793-1.
7
[Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].[使用现代言语测听方法对助听器益处的指征及验证(德语)]
HNO. 2011 Oct;59(10):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2345-5.
8
[Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].[德语中不同言语可懂度测试的比较(弗莱堡言语测试与哥廷根句子测试及单音节押韵测试)]
HNO. 2009 Mar;57(3):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s00106-008-1727-9.
9
[Speech audiometry and new word-tests].[言语测听法与新的词汇测试]
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1953;162(5):394-431.
10
Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.噪声环境下英语无意义音节识别分析
Phonetica. 2003 Apr-Jun;60(2):129-57. doi: 10.1159/000071450.