From the Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA (S.H.C., S.J.J., L.-C.W., J.P.P., C.R., M.C., C.J.-Y.L., A.W.H., A.V.K., S.A.L., P.T.E.).
Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (L.-C.W., A.W.H., S.A.L., P.T.E.).
Circ Res. 2020 Jan 17;126(2):200-209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315686. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 genetic loci for atrial fibrillation (AF); recent work described an association between loss-of-function (LOF) variants in and early-onset AF.
We sought to determine the contribution of rare and common genetic variation to AF risk in the general population.
The UK Biobank is a population-based study of 500 000 individuals including a subset with genome-wide genotyping and exome sequencing. In this case-control study, we included AF cases and controls of genetically determined white-European ancestry; analyses were performed using a logistic mixed-effects model adjusting for age, sex, the first 4 principal components of ancestry, empirical relationships, and case-control imbalance. An exome-wide, gene-based burden analysis was performed to examine the relationship between AF and rare, high-confidence LOF variants in genes with ≥10 LOF carriers. A polygenic risk score for AF was estimated using the LDpred algorithm. We then compared the contribution of AF polygenic risk score and LOF variants to AF risk.
The study included 1546 AF cases and 41 593 controls. In an analysis of 9099 genes with sufficient LOF variant carriers, a significant association between AF and rare LOF variants was observed in a single gene, (odds ratio, 2.71, =2.50×10). The association with AF was more significant (odds ratio, 6.15, =3.26×10) when restricting to LOF variants located in exons highly expressed in cardiac tissue (). Overall, 0.44% of individuals carried variants, of whom 14% had AF. Among individuals in the highest 0.44% of the AF polygenic risk score only 9.3% had AF. In contrast, the AF polygenic risk score explained 4.7% of the variance in AF susceptibility, while variants only accounted for 0.2%.
Both monogenic and polygenic factors contribute to AF risk in the general population. While rare variants confer a substantial AF penetrance, the additive effect of many common variants explains a larger proportion of genetic susceptibility to AF.
全基因组关联研究已经确定了 100 多个与心房颤动(AF)相关的遗传位点;最近的研究描述了 和早发 AF 之间的功能丧失(LOF)变异体的关联。
我们旨在确定在普通人群中,稀有和常见遗传变异对 AF 风险的贡献。
英国生物库是一项针对 50 万人的基于人群的研究,其中包括一部分具有全基因组基因分型和外显子组测序的个体。在这项病例对照研究中,我们纳入了具有遗传决定的白种欧洲血统的 AF 病例和对照;使用逻辑混合效应模型进行分析,该模型调整了年龄、性别、祖源的前 4 个主成分、经验关系和病例对照不平衡。进行了外显子全基因组、基于基因的负担分析,以检查 AF 与基因中罕见、高置信度 LOF 变异之间的关系,这些基因的 LOF 携带者≥10。使用 LDpred 算法估计了 AF 的多基因风险评分。然后,我们比较了 AF 多基因风险评分和 LOF 变异对 AF 风险的贡献。
研究纳入了 1546 例 AF 病例和 41593 例对照。在对 9099 个具有足够 LOF 变异携带者的基因进行分析时,在一个基因中观察到 AF 与罕见 LOF 变异之间存在显著关联,即 (比值比,2.71,=2.50×10)。当限制位于心脏组织高表达的外显子中的 LOF 变异时,与 AF 的关联更加显著(比值比,6.15,=3.26×10)()。总体而言,0.44%的个体携带 变异体,其中 14%患有 AF。在 AF 多基因风险评分最高的 0.44%的个体中,只有 9.3%患有 AF。相比之下,AF 多基因风险评分解释了 AF 易感性变异的 4.7%,而 变异仅占 0.2%。
单基因和多基因因素都有助于普通人群中 AF 的风险。虽然罕见的 变异体赋予了相当大的 AF 外显率,但许多常见变异体的累加效应解释了对 AF 遗传易感性的更大比例。