Suppr超能文献

门诊患者非医疗换药的影响:一项更新的系统文献综述

The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review.

作者信息

Weeda Erin R, Nguyen Elaine, Martin Silas, Ingham Michael, Sobieraj Diana M, Bookhart Brahim K, Coleman Craig I

机构信息

The College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Idaho State University College of Pharmacy, Boise, ID, USA.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Oct 19;7(1):1678563. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. : To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. : An updated search through 10/1/2018 in Medline and Web of Science was performed. : We included studies evaluating ≥25 patients and measuring the impact of NMS of drugs on ≥1 endpoint. : The direction of association between NMS and endpoints was classified as negative, positive or neutral. : Thirty-eight studies contributed 154 endpoints. The direction of association was negative (n = 48; 31.2%) or neutral (n = 91; 59.1%) more often than it was positive (n = 15; 9.7%). Stratified by endpoint type, NMS was associated with a negative impact on clinical, economic, health-care utilization and medication-taking behavior in 26.9%,41.7%,30.3% and 75.0% of cases; with a positive effect seen in 3.0% (resource utilization) to 14.0% (clinical) of endpoints. Of the 92 endpoints from studies performed by the entity dictating the NMS, 88.0%were neutral or positive; whereas, only 40.3%of endpoints from studies conducted separately from the interested entity were neutral or positive. : NMS was commonly associated with negative or neutral endpoints and was seldom associated with positive ones.

摘要

非医学换药(NMS)定义为因有效性、耐受性或依从性以外的原因换用临床疗效相似但化学结构不同的药物。更新一项之前的系统评价,评估非医学换药对结局的影响。于2018年10月1日在Medline和科学网进行了更新检索。我们纳入了评估≥25例患者并测量药物非医学换药对≥1个终点影响的研究。非医学换药与终点之间的关联方向分为阴性、阳性或中性。38项研究提供了154个终点。关联方向为阴性(n = 48;31.2%)或中性(n = 91;59.1%)的情况比阳性(n = 15;9.7%)更为常见。按终点类型分层,非医学换药在26.9%、41.7%、30.3%和75.0%的病例中分别与对临床、经济、医疗保健利用和用药行为的负面影响相关;在3.0%(资源利用)至14.0%(临床)的终点中观察到有积极影响。在由决定非医学换药的机构开展的研究中的92个终点里,88.0%为中性或阳性;而在与相关机构独立开展的研究中的终点里,只有40.3%为中性或阳性。非医学换药通常与阴性或中性终点相关,很少与阳性终点相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dae/6818107/c1b52579d7db/ZJMA_A_1678563_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验