• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在单一的三级中心,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学和功能学结果:这些结果是否可以在整个学习曲线过程中得到保持?

Oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients in a single tertiary center: Can these be preserved throughout the learning curve?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Nov;60(6):463-471. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.463. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

DOI:10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.463
PMID:31692995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6821988/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the overall and segmental oncological and functional outcome of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) during the learning curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 2007 to November 2017, a total of 120 bladder cancer patients were treated with RARC in a single-tertiary hospital. These were divided into three groups of 40 consecutive cases. Overall and subgroup analysis of each group was used to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes throughout the learning curve.

RESULTS

Among the 120 RARC cases, 42, 73, and 5 patients received extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD), intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), and ureterocutaneostomy, respectively. There was a transition from ECUD to ICUD during the learning curve. The positive surgical margin rate was 0.8%. The mean lymph node yield for the standard and extended pelvic lymph node dissection was 12.5 and 30.1, respectively, and increased to 19.8 and 31.2 and further to 20.0 and 37.9, respectively, with each additional series of 40 cases. The 5-year overall survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.6% and 81.4%, respectively. The 1-year daytime continence rate was 75.7%, while the nighttime continence rate was 51.4%. The potency preservation rate was 66.7% (n=8) with or without phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) at 1 year and 33.3% without PDE5-I (n=4).

CONCLUSIONS

RARC results in comparable oncological and functional outcomes to open radical cystectomy. In addition, the oncological and functional outcomes were well maintained throughout the learning curve. ECUD transition to ICUD was safe and did not compromise oncological or functional outcome.

摘要

目的

评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)在学习曲线期间的整体和节段性肿瘤学和功能结果。

材料和方法

2007 年 8 月至 2017 年 11 月,在一家三级医院对 120 例膀胱癌患者进行了 RARC 治疗。这些患者被分为三组,每组 40 例连续病例。通过对每组进行总体和亚组分析,评估整个学习曲线期间的肿瘤学和功能结果。

结果

在 120 例 RARC 病例中,42、73 和 5 例患者分别接受了体外尿路转流术(ECUD)、体内尿路转流术(ICUD)和输尿管皮造口术。在学习曲线期间,ECUD 向 ICUD 过渡。阳性切缘率为 0.8%。标准和扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术的平均淋巴结产量分别为 12.5 和 30.1,分别增加到 19.8 和 31.2,进一步增加到 20.0 和 37.9,每个系列增加 40 例。5 年总生存率和 3 年无复发生存率分别为 86.6%和 81.4%。1 年日间控尿率为 75.7%,夜间控尿率为 51.4%。1 年后,无论是否使用磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(PDE5-I),保能率均为 66.7%(n=8),无 PDE5-I 时为 33.3%(n=4)。

结论

RARC 的肿瘤学和功能结果与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相当。此外,在整个学习曲线过程中,肿瘤学和功能结果均得到很好的维持。ECUD 向 ICUD 的过渡是安全的,不会影响肿瘤学或功能结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/864bd43ca653/icu-60-463-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/416658495113/icu-60-463-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/9c2bca50b8b8/icu-60-463-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/864bd43ca653/icu-60-463-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/416658495113/icu-60-463-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/9c2bca50b8b8/icu-60-463-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0836/6821988/864bd43ca653/icu-60-463-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients in a single tertiary center: Can these be preserved throughout the learning curve?在单一的三级中心,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学和功能学结果:这些结果是否可以在整个学习曲线过程中得到保持?
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Nov;60(6):463-471. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.463. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
2
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Total Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Comparative Analysis with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全体内尿流改道术:与体外尿流改道术的对比分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 May;26(5):349-55. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0543. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体外与体内尿流改道术的围手术期结果及并发症比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;43(6):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术比较分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Surgical proficiency in laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion and its adequacy for the execution of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术的手术熟练程度及其在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术中的应用。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Apr;17(2):e13289. doi: 10.1111/ases.13289.
7
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
8
Do patients benefit from total intracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy?: A comparative analysis with extracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy from a Korean multicenter study.全腹腔镜下机器人根治性膀胱切除术是否使患者受益?:来自韩国多中心研究的与体外机器人根治性膀胱切除术的对比分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jan;61(1):11-18. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.11. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Robotic Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: Head-to-head Comparison From a Single-Institutional Prospective Study.机器人根治性膀胱切除术联合体腔内或体腔外回肠导管尿流改道术的围手术期结果和并发症:来自单中心前瞻性研究的头对头比较。
Urology. 2019 Jul;129:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.059. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术:荟萃分析、累积分析和系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):321-333. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion based on radical cystectomy pentafecta.基于根治性膀胱切除术五项标准的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术加完全体内尿流改道术的学习曲线
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;12:975444. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.975444. eCollection 2022.
2
Gender-related outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A multi-institutional study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的性别相关结果:一项多机构研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Jan;63(1):53-62. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210334.
3
Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder: Description of the "Shell" Technique.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较(RAZOR):一项开放标签、随机、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2525-2536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6.
2
Urinary function following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder urinary reconstruction.根治性膀胱切除术及原位新膀胱尿路重建后的泌尿功能
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Jun;12(6):181-186. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4877. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.
机器人辅助体内原位回肠新膀胱术:“壳”技术描述
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 16;10(16):3601. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163601.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:手术、肿瘤学及功能结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 29;10:583979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583979. eCollection 2020.
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approach for Cystectomy: Trends in the Utilization and Demographic or Clinical Predictors Using the National Cancer Database.微创与开放膀胱切除术方法:利用国家癌症数据库分析其应用趋势及人口统计学或临床预测因素
Urology. 2017 May;103:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Robotic Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Bladder: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助体内帕多瓦回肠膀胱术:手术技术、围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):934-940. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).一项关于开放性、机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的单中心早期随机对照三臂试验(CORAL)
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
7
Complications from robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Where do we stand?机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的并发症:我们目前的情况如何?
Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Mar;40(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
8
Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术的最佳实践:帕萨迪纳共识小组的建议。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
9
Female reproductive organ-sparing radical cystectomy: contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes.保留女性生殖器官的根治性膀胱切除术:当代适应证、技术及结果
Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Mar;25(2):105-10. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000146.
10
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.