Suppr超能文献

获得性运动性言语失用症:电腭图治疗与语音产生治疗的比较。

Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Comparison of Electropalatography Treatment and Sound Production Treatment.

机构信息

Aphasia/Apraxia of Speech Research Program, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 21;29(1S):511-529. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0223. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Abstract

Purpose This investigation compared 2 treatment approaches for acquired apraxia of speech. The effects of a treatment that uses an articulatory-kinematic approach in conjunction with visual biofeedback (VBFB) via electropalatography (EPG) were compared to Sound Production Treatment (SPT), an established behavioral treatment that is also an articulatory-kinematic approach. Method A multiple baseline design across behaviors and participants was used with 2 participants with chronic apraxia of speech and aphasia. Accuracy of target speech sounds in treated and untreated words or phrases in probe sessions served as the dependent variable. The effects of 2 treatments based on an articulatory-kinematic approach were compared: (a) VBFB via EPG and (b) SPT. The order of treatments was counterbalanced across participants. Results Positive changes in articulatory accuracy were observed for SPT and VBFB treatment via EPG. Generalization to untreated stimulus items composed of treated speech sounds was also positive for both treatments. However, participants achieved greater articulatory accuracy with SPT during treatment and better long-term maintenance. Discussion Both treatment approaches resulted in improved speech production accuracy, but gains were greater for SPT. However, further research with additional participants is needed due to the small sample size included in this investigation.

摘要

目的 本研究比较了两种获得性言语失用症的治疗方法。通过口形仪(EPG)进行的结合视觉生物反馈(VBFB)的运动学治疗与已确立的、同样是运动学方法的语音产生治疗(SPT)的治疗效果进行了比较。

方法 采用跨行为和参与者的多个基线设计,对 2 名患有慢性言语失用症和失语症的参与者进行了研究。在探测会话中,目标语音的准确性作为因变量,比较了两种基于运动学方法的治疗方法:(a)EPG 中的 VBFB,和(b)SPT。两种治疗方法的治疗顺序在参与者之间进行了平衡。

结果 SPT 和 EPG 中的 VBFB 治疗都观察到了发音准确性的积极变化。两种治疗方法对包含治疗语音的未治疗刺激项目的泛化也是积极的。然而,参与者在治疗期间和长期维持方面都取得了更大的发音准确性,SPT 效果更佳。

讨论 两种治疗方法都提高了语音产生的准确性,但 SPT 的效果更好。然而,由于本研究的样本量较小,还需要进一步的研究来进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验