Wambaugh Julie L, Wright Sandra, Nessler Christina, Mauszycki Shannon C, Bunker Lisa, Boss Emily, Zhang Yue, Hula William D, Doyle Patrick J
Research Department, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):263-285. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00005. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the effects of dose frequency, an aspect of treatment intensity, on articulation outcomes of sound production treatment (SPT). Method Twelve speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia received SPT administered with an intense dose frequency and a nonintense/traditional dose frequency (SPT-T). Each participant received both treatment intensities in the context of multiple baseline designs across behaviors. SPT-Intense was provided for 3 hourly sessions per day/3 days per week; and SPT-T for 1 hour-long session per day/3 days per week. Twenty-seven treatment sessions were completed with each phase of treatment. Articulation accuracy was measured in probes of production of treated and untreated words. Results All participants achieved improved articulation of treated words with both intensities; there were no notable differences in magnitude of improvement associated with dose frequency. Positive response generalization to untrained words was found in 21 of 24 treatment applications; the cases of negligible response generalization occurred with SPT-T words. Conclusions Dose frequency (and corresponding total intervention duration) did not appear to impact treatment response for treated items. Disparate response generalization findings for 3 participants in the current study may relate to participant characteristics such as apraxia of speech severity and/or stimuli factors.
目的 本研究旨在探讨治疗强度的一个方面,即剂量频率,对语音产生治疗(SPT)的清晰度结果的影响。方法 12名患有言语失用症和失语症的受试者接受了高强度剂量频率和非高强度/传统剂量频率的SPT治疗(SPT-T)。每位受试者在跨行为的多基线设计背景下接受了两种治疗强度。高强度SPT治疗为每天3小时/每周3天;SPT-T为每天1小时/每周3天。每个治疗阶段均完成27次治疗。在治疗和未治疗单词的发音测试中测量清晰度准确性。结果 所有受试者在两种强度下治疗单词的清晰度均有所提高;与剂量频率相关的改善程度没有显著差异。在24次治疗应用中有21次发现对未训练单词的积极反应泛化;反应泛化可忽略不计的情况发生在SPT-T单词上。结论 剂量频率(以及相应的总干预持续时间)似乎并未影响治疗项目的治疗反应。本研究中3名受试者不同的反应泛化结果可能与受试者特征有关,如言语失用症严重程度和/或刺激因素。