• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗强度对获得性言语失用症发声治疗效果的进一步研究:剂量频率重要吗?

Further Study of the Effects of Treatment Intensity on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Does Dose Frequency Matter?

作者信息

Wambaugh Julie L, Wright Sandra, Nessler Christina, Mauszycki Shannon C, Bunker Lisa, Boss Emily, Zhang Yue, Hula William D, Doyle Patrick J

机构信息

Research Department, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):263-285. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00005. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00005
PMID:32011909
Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the effects of dose frequency, an aspect of treatment intensity, on articulation outcomes of sound production treatment (SPT). Method Twelve speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia received SPT administered with an intense dose frequency and a nonintense/traditional dose frequency (SPT-T). Each participant received both treatment intensities in the context of multiple baseline designs across behaviors. SPT-Intense was provided for 3 hourly sessions per day/3 days per week; and SPT-T for 1 hour-long session per day/3 days per week. Twenty-seven treatment sessions were completed with each phase of treatment. Articulation accuracy was measured in probes of production of treated and untreated words. Results All participants achieved improved articulation of treated words with both intensities; there were no notable differences in magnitude of improvement associated with dose frequency. Positive response generalization to untrained words was found in 21 of 24 treatment applications; the cases of negligible response generalization occurred with SPT-T words. Conclusions Dose frequency (and corresponding total intervention duration) did not appear to impact treatment response for treated items. Disparate response generalization findings for 3 participants in the current study may relate to participant characteristics such as apraxia of speech severity and/or stimuli factors.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨治疗强度的一个方面,即剂量频率,对语音产生治疗(SPT)的清晰度结果的影响。方法 12名患有言语失用症和失语症的受试者接受了高强度剂量频率和非高强度/传统剂量频率的SPT治疗(SPT-T)。每位受试者在跨行为的多基线设计背景下接受了两种治疗强度。高强度SPT治疗为每天3小时/每周3天;SPT-T为每天1小时/每周3天。每个治疗阶段均完成27次治疗。在治疗和未治疗单词的发音测试中测量清晰度准确性。结果 所有受试者在两种强度下治疗单词的清晰度均有所提高;与剂量频率相关的改善程度没有显著差异。在24次治疗应用中有21次发现对未训练单词的积极反应泛化;反应泛化可忽略不计的情况发生在SPT-T单词上。结论 剂量频率(以及相应的总干预持续时间)似乎并未影响治疗项目的治疗反应。本研究中3名受试者不同的反应泛化结果可能与受试者特征有关,如言语失用症严重程度和/或刺激因素。

相似文献

1
Further Study of the Effects of Treatment Intensity on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Does Dose Frequency Matter?治疗强度对获得性言语失用症发声治疗效果的进一步研究:剂量频率重要吗?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):263-285. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00005. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Effects of Treatment Intensity on Outcomes in Acquired Apraxia of Speech.治疗强度对获得性运动性言语失用症结局的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):306-322. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0188.
3
Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production.后天性言语失用症的发声治疗:分组练习和随机练习对多音节词发声的影响。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Oct;18(5):450-64. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1101161. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Sound production treatment: effects of blocked and random practice.发声治疗:阻塞式练习与随机练习的效果
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):S225-45. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0072.
5
Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule.获得性言语失用症的治疗:治疗强度和练习时间表的检查。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Feb;22(1):84-102. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0025). Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Effects of Blocked and Random Practice Schedule on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Results of a Group Investigation.阻断式和随机练习计划对获得性言语失用症声音产生治疗结果的影响:一项分组调查的结果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1739-1751. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0249.
7
Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Comparison of Electropalatography Treatment and Sound Production Treatment.获得性运动性言语失用症:电腭图治疗与语音产生治疗的比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 21;29(1S):511-529. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0223. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Acquired apraxia of speech: the effects of repeated practice and rate/rhythm control treatments on sound production accuracy.获得性言语失用症:重复练习和语速/节奏控制治疗对发声准确性的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S5-27. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/11-0102). Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia.针对言语失用症和失语症中语音错误的治疗效果。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):725-43. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4104.725.
10
A Comparison of Sound Production Treatment and Metrical Pacing Therapy for Apraxia of Speech: A Single-Case Experimental Design.言语失用症的发声治疗与韵律节奏疗法比较:单病例实验设计
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2493-2511. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00302. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.逆转颓势:中风后的康复、恢复和重建。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Nov;22(11):745-755. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01231-5. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Apraxia of speech and the study of speech production impairments: Can we avoid further confusion? Reply to Romani (2021).言语失用症与言语产生障碍的研究:我们能否避免进一步的混淆?对 Romani(2021)的回复。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 May-Jun;38(4):309-317. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2021.2009790. Epub 2021 Dec 9.