• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声乳化白内障吸除术联合经结膜与经巩膜睫状体光凝术治疗控制不良的青光眼:一项对比性病例系列研究。

Phacoemulsification Combined With Endoscopic Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Poorly Controlled Glaucoma: A Comparative Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.

Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Mary's Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2020 Jan;29(1):53-59. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001403.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001403
PMID:31693645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report medium-term outcomes of a novel combination of phacoemulsification with transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (phaco-TCP) compared with combined phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (phaco-ECP) in patients with uncontrolled or suboptimally controlled glaucoma and coexisting cataract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case series of 80 consecutive patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. In total, 46 eyes underwent phaco-ECP and 34 phaco-TCP. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between 6 and 21 mm Hg with ≥20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with no increase in ocular hypotensive medications or further glaucoma surgery). Secondary outcomes were change in IOP, number of ocular hypotensive medications and safety.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 32.6 ±10.3 months. Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. At latest follow-up, success rate was greater with phaco-TCP than phaco-ECP (67.6% and 47.8%, P=0.037). IOP was also significantly lower after phaco-TCP (14.88±5.57 mm Hg, from 22.62±6.52 mm Hg) than phaco-ECP (18.07±6.72 mm Hg, from 22.83±7.88, P=0.0273). Ocular hypotensive medications required reduced similarly after phaco-TCP (from 3.38±0.88 to 2.65±1.04 medications, P=0.0012) and phaco-ECP (from 3.07±0.929 to 2.63±1.42 medications, P=0.0108). There were no cases of hypotony or reduction in vision related to glaucoma with either surgical intervention and a similar proportion required further glaucoma surgery (phaco-ECP 15.2%, phako-TCP 5.9%, P=0.2884).

CONCLUSIONS

Phaco-TCP appears more successful in controlling IOP than phaco-ECP with similar safety. Further investigation is warranted of this newly proposed combination which may be particularly useful where access or experience with ECP or other minimally invasive glaucoma surgery is limited.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告超声乳化联合经巩膜睫状体光凝术(phaco-TCP)与超声乳化联合内路睫状体光凝术(phaco-ECP)治疗青光眼伴白内障的中期疗效,前者为新型联合术式,后者为传统联合术式。

材料与方法

本研究为回顾性病例系列研究,共纳入 80 例患者(80 只眼),随访时间均至少 12 个月。其中,46 只眼接受 phaco-ECP,34 只眼接受 phaco-TCP。成功定义为眼压(IOP)在 6 至 21mmHg 之间,且较术前降低≥20%(无需增加降眼压药物或进一步行青光眼手术)。次要观察终点为 IOP 变化、降眼压药物使用数量和安全性。

结果

平均随访时间为 32.6±10.3 个月。两组患者术前临床特征相似。末次随访时,phaco-TCP 组的成功率(67.6%)显著高于 phaco-ECP 组(47.8%)(P=0.037)。phaco-TCP 组术后 IOP 显著低于 phaco-ECP 组(14.88±5.57mmHg 比 18.07±6.72mmHg,P=0.0273)。phaco-TCP 组和 phaco-ECP 组术后降眼压药物使用数量均减少(分别由 3.38±0.88 降至 2.65±1.04 种和由 3.07±0.929 降至 2.63±1.42 种,均 P=0.0012 和 P=0.0108)。两组均无眼压过低或与青光眼相关的视力下降病例,且需要进一步行青光眼手术的比例相似(phaco-ECP 组 15.2%,phaco-TCP 组 5.9%,P=0.2884)。

结论

与 phaco-ECP 相比,phaco-TCP 治疗青光眼合并白内障更能有效控制眼压,且安全性相当。该新型联合术式可能尤其适用于 ECP 或其他微创青光眼手术经验或条件有限的情况,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Phacoemulsification Combined With Endoscopic Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Poorly Controlled Glaucoma: A Comparative Case Series.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合经结膜与经巩膜睫状体光凝术治疗控制不良的青光眼:一项对比性病例系列研究。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Jan;29(1):53-59. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001403.
2
Phacoemulsification plus endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus phacoemulsification alone in primary open-angle glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼患者中行超声乳化联合内镜睫状体光凝术与单纯超声乳化术的对比研究
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;28(2):168-174. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001034.
3
Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery: Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation versus Trabeculectomy.白内障与青光眼手术:内镜睫状体光凝术与小梁切除术对比
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct-Dec;24(4):177-182. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_232_16.
4
Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma.联合内镜睫状体光凝术与超声乳化术对比单纯超声乳化术治疗轻至中度青光眼
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;43(6):531-9. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12510. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
Transscleral vs endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: safety and efficacy when combined with phacoemulsification.经巩膜与经结膜睫状体光凝术联合超声乳化白内障吸除术:安全性和有效性比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02877-6.
6
Combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: Comparison of viscocanalostomy, endocyclophotocoagulation, and ab interno trabeculectomy.联合青光眼和白内障手术:黏小管切开术、内眼睫状体光凝术和经内路小梁切开术的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 May;44(5):557-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.024.
7
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma.在药物控制的青光眼患者中,内镜睫状体光凝联合超声乳化术与单纯超声乳化术的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):1313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021.
8
Outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with two iStent inject trabecular microbypass stents with or without endocyclophotocoagulation.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合使用或不联合使用内路环光凝的两种 iStent inject 小梁微旁路引流植入物的效果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;104(10):1378-1383. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315434. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Differential Efficacy of Combined Phacoemulsification and Endocyclophotocoagulation in Open-angle Glaucoma Versus Angle-closure Glaucoma.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合眼内光凝术治疗开角型青光眼与闭角型青光眼的疗效差异。
J Glaucoma. 2019 May;28(5):473-480. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001225.
10
Effect of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes when combined with cataract surgery.内镜睫状体光凝术联合白内障手术对屈光结果的影响。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;50(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.03.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Current trends and advancements in utilizing endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma.利用内窥镜睫状体光凝术治疗青光眼的最新趋势和进展。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Nov 14;39(1):277. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04185-x.
2
Combined Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation and Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification Alone in the Glaucoma Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.青光眼治疗中联合内镜睫状体光凝术与单纯超声乳化术的对比:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Mar 9;16(3):e55853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55853. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
A comparative study of ultrasound cycloplasty and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of secondary glaucoma.
超声睫状体成形术与经结膜睫状体光凝术治疗继发性青光眼的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):23073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50157-6.
4
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma compared to alternative procedures -A Systematic review.与其他手术方法相比,内镜睫状体光凝术治疗青光眼——一项系统评价
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 27;16(2):211-219. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_106_22. eCollection 2023 May-Aug.
5
Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.激光在青光眼治疗中的应用概述。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;41(3):1111-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01654-4. Epub 2020 Nov 19.