Marco Sheila, Damji Karim F, Nazarali Samir, Rudnisky Chris J
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct-Dec;24(4):177-182. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_232_16.
To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (trab) in combination with cataract surgery.
We evaluated the 6-month results of patients undergoing phacoemulsification (phaco) with either ECP or trab. The primary outcome was mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 6 months; secondary outcomes were change in glaucoma medications, visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, and postoperative complications. Complete success was a target IOP of <21 mmHg and >6 mmHg without glaucoma medications. Qualified success was target IOP achieved through glaucoma medications.
We evaluated 53 eyes of 53 patients; 24 (45.3%) eyes were treated with ECP-phaco and 29 (54.7%) with trab-phaco. At 6 months, there was no significant difference in mean IOP of the two groups (ECP-phaco 14.2 ± 3.6 mmHg; trab-phaco 13.0 ± 2.5 mmHg; = 0.240). Six (25.0%) ECP-phaco eyes and 20 (69.0%) trab-phaco eyes achieved complete success ( = 0.002). Qualified success was achieved in 18 (75.0%) ECP-phaco eyes and 9 (31.0%) trab-phaco eyes ( = 0.002). The mean reduction of medication from baseline was significant (ECP-phaco 1.2 ± 1.1; trab-phaco 2.1 ± 1.5; = 0.020). ECP-phaco resulted in more IOP spikes on the 1 postoperative day ( = 0.040) and more anterior cellular reaction at 1 week and 1 month compared to trab-phaco ( < 0.05). The rate of postoperative complications was not significantly different between groups.
At 6 months, ECP-phaco demonstrated similar improvements in IOP and visual acuity compared to trab-phaco. However, ECP-phaco patients had higher incidences of immediate postoperative IOP spikes and anterior chamber inflammation as well as requiring additional medications postoperatively.
比较内镜睫状体光凝术(ECP)与小梁切除术联合丝裂霉素C(小梁切除术)并联合白内障手术的疗效和安全性。
我们评估了接受超声乳化白内障吸除术(phaco)联合ECP或小梁切除术患者的6个月结果。主要结局是6个月时的平均眼压(IOP);次要结局是青光眼药物治疗的变化、视力、眼内炎症和术后并发症。完全成功定义为目标眼压<21 mmHg且停用青光眼药物后眼压>6 mmHg。合格成功是指通过青光眼药物治疗达到目标眼压。
我们评估了53例患者的53只眼;24只(45.3%)眼接受了ECP-phaco治疗,29只(54.7%)眼接受了小梁切除术-phaco治疗。6个月时,两组的平均眼压无显著差异(ECP-phaco组为14.2±3.6 mmHg;小梁切除术-phaco组为13.0±2.5 mmHg;P = 0.240)。6只(25.0%)ECP-phaco眼和20只(69.0%)小梁切除术-phaco眼达到完全成功(P = 0.002)。18只(75.0%)ECP-phaco眼和9只(31.0%)小梁切除术-phaco眼达到合格成功(P = 0.002)。与基线相比,药物治疗的平均减少量具有显著性(ECP-phaco组为1.2±1.1;小梁切除术-phaco组为2.1±1.5;P = 0.020)。与小梁切除术-phaco相比,ECP-phaco术后第1天眼压峰值更多(P = 0.040),术后1周和1个月时前房细胞反应更明显(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。
6个月时,与小梁切除术-phaco相比,ECP-phaco在眼压和视力改善方面表现相似。然而,ECP-phaco患者术后即刻眼压峰值和前房炎症发生率更高,且术后需要额外用药。