Rodriguez-Perea Angela, Chirosa Ríos Luis J, Martinez-Garcia Dario, Ulloa-Díaz David, Guede Rojas Francisco, Jerez-Mayorga Daniel, Chirosa Rios Ignacio J
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, CIEDE, Catholic University of Most Holy Conception, Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 18;7:e7883. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7883. eCollection 2019.
To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.
Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V = 015 m s , V = 0.30 m s, V = 0.45 m s) and two range of movement (R = 25% cm ; R = 50% cm) protocols.
All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m s and short range of movement (VR) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m s and a large range of movement (VR CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m s and short range of movement (VR) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.
Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.
使用功能性机电测力计评估躯干屈肌的等速肌力,确定功能性躯干测试的绝对和相对可靠性,确定最可靠的评估条件,比较躯干屈肌平均力和峰值力的绝对和相对可靠性,并确定哪种等速评估条件与最大等长收缩最相关。
对37名身体活跃的男性学生志愿者进行重测,他们执行不同的方案,即等长收缩以及三种速度(V = 0.15 m/s、V = 0.30 m/s、V = 0.45 m/s)和两种运动范围(R = 25°cm;R = 50°cm)方案的组合。
所有评估躯干屈肌的方案都显示出绝对可靠性,等长和动态方案具有稳定的可重复性,变异系数(CV)低于10%,相对可靠性高或非常高(0.69 < 组内相关系数[ICC] > 0.86)。评估躯干屈肌向心收缩最可靠的力量表现(CV = 6.82%)是平均力,在0.15 m/s和短运动范围(VR)条件下。评估躯干屈肌离心收缩最可靠的力量表现是峰值力,在0.15 m/s和大运动范围(VR CV = 5.07%)下,评估等长躯干屈肌最可靠的方法是峰值力(CV = 7.72%)。在0.45 m/s和短运动范围(VR)条件下,离心躯干屈肌力量的平均力(r = 0.73)与最大等长收缩最相关。
功能性机电测力法是评估躯干屈肌力量的可靠评估系统。