School of Economics, Lanzhou University, 222 Tianshui South Ave., 730000, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Evidence-based Social Science Research Center, Lanzhou University, 222 Tianshui South Ave., Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Nov 7;17(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7.
To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library.
The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in order to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews using a MOOSE checklist. BICOMS-2 and UCINET software were used to produce the social network, and Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2) and STATA 13.0 were used to analyze the related data.
Fifty-seven systematic reviews of social welfare were included. Twenty-eight items of the included social welfare systematic reviews were rated as complete (≥70%). There were significant differences between ≤2013 and ≥ 2014 in five items. These differences were as follows: research published by one organization or more than one organization in one item, more than three authors or less than four authors in two items, and one country or more than one country in six items. It's completed about researches with more than one organization, three authors or more than one country. Some items were found to have a low reporting rate of studies published before 2014, by one organization, with less than four authors or one country, respectively. The social network of authors and organizations showed good collaboration.
Some items could be further improved with regard to the rate of reporting systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. This could improve the overall quality of social welfare systematic reviews.
分析坎贝尔协作在线图书馆中社会福利系统评价的协作和报告质量。
在坎贝尔协作在线图书馆中搜索社会福利系统评价，并提取基本信息，以便使用 MOOSE 清单评估系统评价的报告质量。使用 BICOMS-2 和 UCINET 软件生成社会网络，使用 Comprehensive Meta Analysis（版本 2）和 STATA 13.0 分析相关数据。
共纳入 57 篇社会福利系统评价。28 项纳入的社会福利系统评价被评为完整（≥70%）。在≤2013 年和≥2014 年之间，有五项存在显著差异。这些差异如下：一项研究由一个或多个组织发表，一项研究由多于三个作者或少于四个作者发表，六项研究由一个国家或多个国家发表。研究完成了更多涉及多于一个组织、三个作者或多于一个国家的研究。一些项目的报告率较低，分别涉及 2014 年之前由一个组织、少于四个作者或一个国家发表的研究。作者和组织的社会网络显示出良好的协作。
坎贝尔协作在线图书馆中社会福利系统评价的报告率有些项目可以进一步提高，这可以提高社会福利系统评价的整体质量。
