Atbaşı Zafer, Erdem Yusuf, Neyişci Çağrı, Yılmaz Barış, Demiralp Bahtiyar
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Güven Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019 Nov;25(6):555-560. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.UTD-99690.
In this study, we aim to assess the safe, risky and high-risky zones by measuring the proximity of the needles to the peroneal and saphenous nerves in millimeters for the repair of tears of the anterior, middle and posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci at flexion and extension position during inside-out repair technique.
First, a cadaveric study was conducted on 10 cadaver knees in which both (lateral and medial) menisci were divided into anterior, corpus and posterior with the longitudinal tear simulating in each section. The next phase involved the suture of the simulated tears of the menisci while the knee was at 90° of flexion and full extension. Finally, the distance from the exit points of the K-wire being inserted through meniscal anterior, corpus and posterior tears to the aforementioned nerves was measured with a digital caliper.
The distance between K-wire exit points and neurovascular structures concerning corpus and anterior horn tear repair of both menisci were considered far away and not included. However, closer posterior menisci measurements were taken to avoid the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. The measured distances for lateral meniscus posterior tears were recorded 11±5.2 mm at 90° of flexion and 8±4.5 mm at extension, whereas those recorded 17.3±5.7 mm at 90° of flexion and 13.7±4.7 mm at extension for medial meniscus. These variables were evaluated statistically using a paired t-test; the mean of t value was not considered statistically significant.
Our results show that the inside-out technique at knee flexion is safe even in the posterior meniscus tears. However, safety distance can be increased with the higher flexion degrees of the knee. Lastly, in posterior meniscal tear repair, we recommend either retractor assisted mini-open technique at knee flexion, or all-inside suture technique, to avoid nerve injury risk in this zone. Although many surgeons do not prefer inside-out techniques for posterior menisci tears, inside-out posterior meniscal repair of both menisci is as safe as an all-inside technique using retractor assisted mini-open technique with the knee at higher than 90° flexion.
在本研究中,我们旨在通过测量在内外侧半月板前、中、后角撕裂修复过程中,膝关节屈伸位时针与腓总神经和隐神经的距离(以毫米为单位)来评估安全区、风险区和高风险区。
首先,对10具尸体膝关节进行尸体研究,将两侧(外侧和内侧)半月板均分为前、体部和后三部分,并在每个部分模拟纵向撕裂。下一阶段是在膝关节屈曲90°和完全伸直时缝合半月板的模拟撕裂处。最后,用数字卡尺测量通过半月板前、体部和后撕裂处插入的克氏针出口点到上述神经的距离。
对于两侧半月板体部和前角撕裂修复,克氏针出口点与神经血管结构之间的距离被认为较远,未包含在内。然而,对后半月板进行了更近距离的测量,以避免医源性神经损伤的风险。外侧半月板后角撕裂在屈曲90°时的测量距离记录为11±5.2毫米,伸直时为8±4.5毫米,而内侧半月板在屈曲90°时为17.3±5.7毫米,伸直时为13.7±4.7毫米。使用配对t检验对这些变量进行统计学评估;t值的均值未被认为具有统计学意义。
我们的结果表明,即使在后半月板撕裂的情况下,膝关节屈曲位的内外侧技术也是安全的。然而,随着膝关节屈曲程度的增加,安全距离可以增大。最后,在后半月板撕裂修复中,我们建议在膝关节屈曲时采用牵开器辅助的迷你开放技术,或全内缝合技术,以避免该区域的神经损伤风险。尽管许多外科医生不喜欢用内外侧技术修复后半月板撕裂,但使用牵开器辅助的迷你开放技术且膝关节屈曲高于90°时,内外侧后半月板修复与全内技术一样安全。