Quality improvement in healthcare: the need for valid, reliable and efficient methods and indicators.
作者信息
Islam Mohaimenul, Li Yu-Chuan Jack
机构信息
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, 250-Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei, Taiwan.
International Center for Health Information Technology (ICHIT), Taipei Medical University, 250-Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei, Taiwan.
出版信息
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):495-496. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz077.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Quality improvement in healthcare: the need for valid, reliable and efficient methods and indicators.医疗保健中的质量改进：对有效、可靠且高效的方法和指标的需求。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):495-496. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz077.
2
Nationaler Strategiebericht: Quality Strategy in Swiss Health Care.国家战略报告：瑞士医疗保健领域的质量战略
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(9-10):660-1. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
3
The quest for quality: excellence in the new era of care delivery.对质量的追求：医疗服务新时代的卓越表现。
Hosp Health Netw. 2012 Mar;86(3):51-61.
4
Using a hospital quality improvement toolkit to improve performance on the AHRQ quality indicators.使用医院质量改进工具包来提高美国医疗保健研究与质量局（AHRQ）质量指标的绩效。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Apr;39(4):177-84. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39024-2.
5
Improving quality improvement.提升质量改进。
Am J Surg. 2012 Dec;204(6):815-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.004.
6
Using Data to Enhance Performance and Improve Quality and Safety in Surgery.利用数据提升手术性能、改善质量与安全。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):972-973. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888.
7
Quality of Healthcare.
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2016 Dec 27;2016:1-192.
8
[Peer review-can we detect risk factors and errors to improve the quality of patient care?].同行评审——我们能否发现风险因素和错误以提高患者护理质量？
Urologe A. 2018 Jul;57(7):785-789. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0662-y.
9
The National Health Performance Authority.国家卫生绩效管理局。
Med J Aust. 2013 Feb 18;198(3):133. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10097.
10
Tackling avoidable hospital admissions: improving or compromising quality?
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(4):243-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Is a modified Global Trigger Tool method using automatic trigger identification valid when measuring adverse events?使用自动触发识别的改良全球触发工具方法在测量不良事件时是否有效？
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):535-540. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy210.
2
Quality assessment indicators in antenatal care worldwide: a systematic review.全球产前护理中的质量评估指标：系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):497-505. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy206.
3
Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013.早期产前保健就诊：1990 年至 2013 年期间覆盖范围的区域和全球水平及趋势的系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e977-e983. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30325-X.
4
Toward a Safer Health Care System: The Critical Need to Improve Measurement.迈向更安全的医疗保健系统：改进衡量标准的迫切需求。
JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1831-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3448.
5
Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes.医疗保健中的不良事件：从错误中学习。
QJM. 2015 Apr;108(4):273-7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu145. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
6
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.“全球触发工具”显示，医院中的不良事件可能比之前测量的高出十倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
7
Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.测量医院不良事件：评估全球触发工具的评价者间可靠性和触发性能。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):266-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq026. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
8
The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.创建一份用于评估医疗保健干预措施随机和非随机研究方法学质量的清单的可行性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.
9
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.住院患者不良事件和过失的发生率。哈佛医疗实践研究I的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604.
Zotero 插件