Department of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, P.O Box 501, 1800 AM, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1324-7.
Proximal femoral fractures are strongly associated with morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Mortality is highest among frail institutionalized elderly with both physical and cognitive comorbidities who consequently have a limited life expectancy. Evidence based guidelines on whether or not to operate on these patients in the case of a proximal femoral fracture are lacking. Practice variation occurs, and it remains unknown if nonoperative treatment would result in at least the same quality of life as operative treatment. This study aims to determine the effect of nonoperative management versus operative management of proximal femoral fractures in a selected group of frail institutionalized elderly on the quality of life, level of pain, rate of complications, time to death, satisfaction of the patient (or proxy) and the caregiver with the management strategy, and health care consumption.
This is a multicenter, observational cohort study. Frail institutionalized elderly (70 years or older with a body mass index < 18.5, a Functional Ambulation Category of 2 or lower pre-trauma, or an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4 or 5), who sustained a proximal femoral fracture are eligible to participate. Patients with a pathological or periprosthetic fractures and known metastatic oncological disease will be excluded. Treatment decision will be reached following a structured shared decision process. The primary outcome is quality of life (Euro-QoL; EQ-5D-5 L). Secondary outcome measures are quality of life measured with the QUALIDEM, pain level (PACSLAC), pain medication use, treatment satisfaction of patient (or proxy) and caregivers, quality of dying (QODD), time to death, and direct medical costs. A cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis will be done, using the EQ-5D utility score and QUALIDEM score, respectively. Non-inferiority of nonoperative treatment is assumed with a limit of 0.15 on the EQ-5D score. Data will be acquired at 7, 14, and 30 days and at 3 and 6 months after trauma.
The results of this study will provide insight into the true value of nonoperative treatment of proximal femoral fractures in frail elderly with a limited life expectancy. The results may be used for updating (inter)national treatment guidelines.
The study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7245; date 10-06-2018).
股骨近端骨折与老年患者的发病率和死亡率密切相关。身体和认知合并症并存的虚弱、住院的老年患者死亡率最高,他们的预期寿命有限。对于这些股骨近端骨折患者是否进行手术治疗,缺乏循证指南。实践存在差异,目前尚不清楚非手术治疗是否会产生与手术治疗至少相同的生活质量。本研究旨在确定在选定的虚弱、住院老年人群中,非手术治疗与手术治疗股骨近端骨折对生活质量、疼痛程度、并发症发生率、死亡时间、患者(或代理人)和护理人员对治疗策略的满意度以及医疗保健消费的影响。
这是一项多中心、观察性队列研究。符合条件的患者为 70 岁或以上、体重指数<18.5、受伤前功能性步行能力等级为 2 级或以下、或美国麻醉医师协会评分 4 或 5 级的虚弱、住院的老年患者,他们发生了股骨近端骨折。病理性或假体周围骨折和已知转移性肿瘤疾病的患者将被排除在外。治疗决策将在经过结构化的共同决策过程后做出。主要结局是生活质量(Euro-QoL;EQ-5D-5L)。次要结局指标是使用 QUALIDEM 测量的生活质量、疼痛程度(PACSLAC)、疼痛药物使用、患者(或代理人)和护理人员的治疗满意度、临终质量(QODD)、死亡时间和直接医疗费用。将使用 EQ-5D 效用评分和 QUALIDEM 评分分别进行成本效用和成本效果分析。假设非手术治疗的非劣效性限值为 EQ-5D 评分的 0.15。数据将在创伤后 7、14 和 30 天以及 3 和 6 个月时采集。
这项研究的结果将提供关于对预期寿命有限的虚弱老年股骨近端骨折患者进行非手术治疗的真正价值的见解。研究结果可用于更新(国际)治疗指南。
该研究在荷兰临床试验注册库(NTR7245;日期为 2018 年 6 月 10 日)注册。