School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Anatomy, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Prog Brain Res. 2019;250:219-250. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
When compared to the brains of our closest living relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos, the brains of modern humans are larger and differently shaped. This chapter reviews what we know about the evolutionary history of these differences. We can make an educated guess about the size and shape of the brains of the hypothetical common ancestor of modern humans and chimpanzees/bonobos, but between ca. 8 million years ago and the present day evidence about the size and shape of the brain comes from either natural endocasts, which are literally brain-shaped rocks, or from individuals for which enough of the brain case is preserved to provide estimates of endocranial volume and/or the relative proportions of the different regions of the cerebral hemispheres and the cerebellum. The tempo and mode of brain size increase in the hominin clade has been the subject of spirited debate, but we suggest that some of this controversy is the combination of an overreliance on frequentist statistical tests and researchers addressing these issues at different taxonomic scales. The existence and significance of shape changes are also controversial topics, made more so by the dearth of reliable evidence.
与我们最亲近的亲属黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩的大脑相比,现代人的大脑更大,形状也不同。本章回顾了我们对这些差异的进化历史的了解。我们可以根据现代人类和黑猩猩/倭黑猩猩的假设共同祖先的大小和形状进行有根据的猜测,但在大约 800 万年前到现在,有关大脑大小和形状的证据要么来自于真正的脑形岩石,要么来自于那些大脑壳保存得足够完整,可以估计脑内体积和/或大脑半球和小脑不同区域的相对比例的个体。在人科动物进化枝中,大脑大小增加的速度和模式一直是激烈争论的主题,但我们认为,其中一些争议是由于过于依赖频率统计检验以及研究人员在不同的分类尺度上解决这些问题的结合。形状变化的存在和意义也是有争议的话题,由于可靠证据的缺乏,情况变得更加复杂。