University of Hull, Dearne 018, Cottingham Road, Hull HU67RX, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104251. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104251. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
The purpose of this phenomenological study is to reveal how senior staff who have engaged in the development of a transnational nursing curriculum make sense of the opportunity.
Merging two, country specific curricula for a dual award bachelor degree nursing program, taught exclusively in China through 'flying faculty' model is an innovative way to deliver a global nursing education. As with any innovation, lessons can be learned through reflection, to streamline future institutional investments which are responsive to country specific needs.
Four senior staff involved in curriculum development were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi structured interviews were undertaken to elicit data on their experiences during the merger.
Five main themes were key to participant's sense making during the curriculum development process. These were: managing and overcoming differences in expectations and pedagogy, meeting deadlines, engaging stakeholders and the need to think creatively. All participants revealed there had been a significant learning curve during the process, and highlighted the benefits of this in their own development.
Participants perceived transnational education curriculum development as complex. They cited differences in learning, teaching, pedagogy and quality processes as factors to address and identified the most crucial elements to success, were communication, mutual engagement, meeting deadlines and the ability to think creatively. Their continual efforts to understand systems and processes allowed them to make sense of this complex undertaking.
本现象学研究旨在揭示参与跨国护理课程开发的资深员工如何理解这一机会。
将两个特定于国家的课程合并为一个中澳双学位护理本科课程,通过“飞行教师”模式在中国独家授课,是提供全球护理教育的一种创新方式。与任何创新一样,可以通过反思吸取经验教训,精简未来的机构投资,以响应特定于国家的需求。
通过目的性抽样,招募了 4 名参与课程开发的资深员工。进行半结构化访谈,以获取有关他们在合并期间的经验的数据。
参与者在课程开发过程中的主要意义有 5 个主题。这些是:管理和克服期望和教学法方面的差异,按时完成任务,让利益相关者参与进来,以及需要创造性思维。所有参与者都表示,在这个过程中有一个显著的学习曲线,并且强调了这对他们自身发展的好处。
参与者认为跨国教育课程开发很复杂。他们列举了学习、教学、教学法和质量过程方面的差异是需要解决的因素,并确定了成功的最关键要素,包括沟通、相互参与、按时完成任务和创造性思维能力。他们不断努力理解系统和流程,使他们能够理解这一复杂的任务。