Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM, Laboratório Associado), Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;73:103276. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2019.103276. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
Pharmaceutical drugs in the wild may pose significant risks to non-target exposed organisms. This situation is even more troublesome for coastal marine or estuarine environments, located in the vicinity of large human conglomerates, for which the putative number of pollutants is extremely high, and the regime by which wild organisms are exposed is continuous. In addition, the number of studies addressing this issue is still scarce, despite evidences that show the potential contamination profiles and adverse biological effects in organisms from such areas. In this study, the ecotoxicity of common pharmaceutical drugs (namely paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid) was assessed, by studying the susceptibility of the mussel species Mytilus spp to oxidative stress after being exposed for 96 h to increasing but ecologically relevant concentrations of the two mentioned pharmaceuticals (paracetamol: 0, 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 μg/L; acetylsalicylic acid: 0, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg/L). The oxidative status in exposed organisms was analyzed by measuring oxidative stress biomarkers, namely catalase (CAT), glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), and lipoperoxidation (LPO) levels, whose alteration was indicative of chemical exposure, in both digestive gland and gills of the organisms. In addition, the food uptake and the nutritional reserve status of exposed organisms were also assessed, by measuring the consumption of ingested food, and levels of tissue reserves of glycogen in gills and digestive gland. No significant alterations were observed in the assessed oxidative stress parameters so it was possible to hypothesize that the studied drugs may have probably exerted a limited alteration of antioxidant defenses and damage, which was reverted by the activation of defensive adaptive mechanisms. This set of data evidenced that the pro-oxidative metabolism that was already described for both drugs in other animal models, was not fully established in the exposed mussels. On the contrary, glycogen reserves were substantially changed after exposure to both toxicants, being possible to observe opposite responses caused by both drugs. Food uptake was not altered following exposure to the drugs. Further evaluations are thus required to conclude about both drugs ecotoxicity and other parameters, namely seasonality, which should be considered when performing ecotoxicology tests, especially with the selected species.
野生环境中的药物可能会对非目标暴露生物构成重大风险。对于位于大型人类聚居区附近的沿海或河口环境来说,这种情况更加麻烦,因为那里的污染物数量极高,而且野生生物暴露的方式是连续的。此外,尽管有证据表明这些地区的生物存在潜在的污染状况和不良的生物效应,但涉及这个问题的研究数量仍然很少。在这项研究中,通过研究贻贝类在暴露于两种常见药物(即对乙酰氨基酚和乙酰水杨酸)不同浓度下 96 小时后,对氧化应激的敏感性,评估了这两种药物的生态毒性(对乙酰氨基酚:0、0.5、5、50 和 500μg/L;乙酰水杨酸:0、0.1、1、10 和 100μg/L)。通过测量氧化应激生物标志物(即过氧化氢酶(CAT)、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GSTs)和脂质过氧化(LPO)水平)来分析暴露生物的氧化状态,这些生物标志物的改变表明了化学暴露,这些标志物分别在贻贝的消化腺和鳃中进行了测量。此外,还通过测量摄入食物的消耗量和鳃组织和消化腺组织中糖原的储备水平,评估了暴露生物的食物摄入和营养储备状况。在所评估的氧化应激参数中未观察到明显的变化,因此可以假设研究中的药物可能对抗氧化防御和损伤产生了有限的影响,这些影响可以通过激活防御性适应机制来逆转。这组数据表明,在其他动物模型中已经描述了这两种药物的促氧化代谢,但在暴露的贻贝中尚未完全建立。相反,暴露于两种毒物后,糖原储备发生了实质性变化,可能观察到两种药物引起的相反反应。暴露于药物后,食物摄入量没有改变。因此,需要进一步评估这两种药物的生态毒性和其他参数,如季节性,在进行生态毒理学试验时应考虑这些因素,特别是对于所选物种。