Haughey Brena S, White Shelby C, Pacheco Garrett S, Fox Kenneth A, Seckeler Michael D
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):237-240. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02247-4. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
Single ventricle congenital heart disease (SV CHD) patients are at risk of morbidity and mortality between the first and second palliative surgical procedures (interstage). When these patients present acutely they often require invasive intervention. This study sought to compare the outcomes and costs of elective and emergent invasive cardiac procedures for interstage patients. Retrospective review of discharge data from The Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager™, a national health care analytics platform. The database was queried for admissions from 10/2014 to 12/2017 for children 1-6 months old with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for SV CHD who underwent invasive cardiac procedures. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), complication rate, in-hospital mortality and direct costs were compared between elective and emergent admissions using t test or χ, as appropriate. The three most frequently performed procedures were also compared. 871 admissions identified, with 141 (16%) emergent. Age of emergent admission was younger than elective (2.9 vs. 4 months p < 0.001). Emergent admissions including cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis had longer LOS (58.7 vs. 25.8 day, p < 0.001 and 54.8 vs .22.6 days, p < 0.001) and higher costs ($134,774 vs. $84,253, p = 0.013 and $158,679 vs. $81,899, p = 0.017). Emergent admissions for interstage SV CHD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis are associated with longer LOS and higher direct costs, but with no differences in complications or mortality. These findings support aggressive interstage monitoring to minimize the need for emergent interventions for this fragile patient population.
单心室先天性心脏病(SV CHD)患者在首次和第二次姑息性外科手术(两期手术之间)期间有发病和死亡风险。当这些患者急性发病时,往往需要进行侵入性干预。本研究旨在比较两期手术患者进行择期和急诊侵入性心脏手术的结果及费用。对国家医疗保健分析平台Vizient临床数据库/资源管理器™中的出院数据进行回顾性分析。在该数据库中查询2014年10月至2017年12月期间1至6个月大、患有SV CHD且ICD - 9或ICD - 10编码、接受侵入性心脏手术的儿童的入院情况。根据情况使用t检验或χ检验比较择期和急诊入院患者的人口统计学数据、住院时间(LOS)、并发症发生率、院内死亡率和直接费用。还比较了三种最常进行的手术。共确定871例入院病例,其中141例(16%)为急诊入院。急诊入院患者的年龄小于择期入院患者(2.9个月对4个月,p<0.001)。包括心导管插入术或上腔静脉 - 肺动脉吻合术在内的急诊入院患者住院时间更长(分别为58.7天对25.8天,p<0.001;54.8天对22.6天,p<0.001)且费用更高(分别为134,774美元对84,253美元,p = 0.013;158,679美元对81,899美元,p = 0.017)。接受心导管插入术或上腔静脉 - 肺动脉吻合术的两期手术SV CHD急诊入院患者住院时间更长且直接费用更高,但并发症或死亡率无差异。这些发现支持积极的两期手术期间监测,以尽量减少对这一脆弱患者群体进行急诊干预的必要性。