• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴力创伤的系统动力学模型及暴力干预项目的作用。

A System Dynamics Model of Violent Trauma and the Role of Violence Intervention Programs.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Surgery, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.015
PMID:31706544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7028446/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Violence intervention programs (VIPs) can reduce interpersonal violence (IPV); however, optimizing the implementation of VIPs is challenging, given the complex dynamics of IPV. System dynamics models (SDMs) provide a means of visualizing dynamic and causal relationships in such complex systems. We use the IPVSDM to characterize and examine the relationship between IPV, VIPs, and the social determinants of health (SDH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The simulation model was created from a diagram that links putative causal relationships between VIPs, SDH, and IPV events. Simulation rules are then used to calculate a risk of violence parameter based on the SDH, which drives the transition from low-risk to high-risk populations and in turn influences IPV event rates. A qualitative relational approach was used to evaluate long-term effects of VIP on IPV events.

RESULTS

The model produced qualitatively plausible behavior with respect to IPV events, population transitions, and relative overall VIP effect. Simulation runs converged to stable steady states with an exponential benefit of VIP on reducing IPV that is best appreciated after 1-2 y. The VIP functioned in a recognizable fashion by slowing the shift from low-risk to high-risk populations.

CONCLUSIONS

This initial implementation of the IPVSDM produced recognizable baseline behavior while incorporating the possible effects of a VIP. The model allows causality and counterfactual testing, which is impractical in vivo. Community-level VIP efforts should show benefit particularly after a couple years. Future work will emphasize adding complexity to the IPVSDM and identifying real-world metrics to aid in testing, validation, and prediction of the model.

摘要

背景

暴力干预项目(VIP)可以减少人际暴力(IPV);然而,鉴于 IPV 的复杂动态,优化 VIP 的实施具有挑战性。系统动力学模型(SDM)为可视化此类复杂系统中的动态和因果关系提供了一种手段。我们使用 IPVSDM 来描述和检查 IPV、VIP 和健康的社会决定因素(SDH)之间的关系。

材料和方法

该仿真模型是从一个图创建的,该图将 VIP、SDH 和 IPV 事件之间假定的因果关系联系起来。然后,使用仿真规则根据 SDH 计算暴力风险参数,该参数驱动从低风险到高风险人群的转变,并反过来影响 IPV 事件率。定性关系方法用于评估 VIP 对 IPV 事件的长期影响。

结果

该模型在 IPV 事件、人口转移和相对 VIP 总体影响方面产生了定性上合理的行为。模拟运行收敛到稳定的稳定状态,VIP 对减少 IPV 的影响呈指数级增长,在 1-2 年后效果最佳。VIP 以可识别的方式发挥作用,减缓了从低风险到高风险人群的转变。

结论

该 IPVSDM 的初始实施产生了可识别的基线行为,同时纳入了 VIP 的可能影响。该模型允许进行因果关系和反事实测试,这在体内是不切实际的。社区层面的 VIP 工作应该在几年后显示出效益。未来的工作将强调为 IPVSDM 添加复杂性,并确定现实世界的指标来帮助模型的测试、验证和预测。

相似文献

1
A System Dynamics Model of Violent Trauma and the Role of Violence Intervention Programs.暴力创伤的系统动力学模型及暴力干预项目的作用。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
2
A decade of hospital-based violence intervention: Benefits and shortcomings.十年的医院暴力干预:益处与不足。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Dec;81(6):1156-1161. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001261.
3
Hospital-based violence intervention: risk reduction resources that are essential for success.基于医院的暴力干预:减少风险的资源,这对成功至关重要。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Apr;74(4):976-80; discussion 980-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828586c9.
4
Saving lives and saving money: hospital-based violence intervention is cost-effective.拯救生命与节省资金:基于医院的暴力干预具有成本效益。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Feb;78(2):252-7; discussion 257-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000527.
5
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 17 States, 2013.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统,17 个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Aug 19;65(10):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6510a1.
6
Risks go beyond the violence: Association between intimate partner violence, mental illness, and substance abuse among females admitted to a rural Level I trauma center.风险不止于暴力:农村一级创伤中心收治女性的亲密伴侣暴力、精神疾病与药物滥用之间的关联
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):709-14; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000856.
7
Understanding the makeup of a growing field: A committee on trauma survey of the national network of hospital-based violence intervention programs.了解一个不断发展的领域的构成:国家医院为基础的暴力干预项目网络创伤调查委员会。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jan;223(1):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
8
Before and after the trauma bay: the prevention of violent injury among youth.创伤急救室前后:青少年暴力伤害的预防
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.014. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
9
A sporting difference.体育上的差异。
Int J Trauma Nurs. 2001 Jul-Sep;7(3):83-4. doi: 10.1067/mtn.2001.117825.
10
Informing practice regarding marginalization: the application of the Koci Marginality Index.告知边缘化问题的实践:科奇边缘化指数的应用。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Dec;33(12):858-63. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.713081.

引用本文的文献

1
Participatory Modeling for High Complexity, Multi-System Issues: Challenges and Recommendations for Balancing Qualitative Understanding and Quantitative Questions.针对高度复杂的多系统问题的参与式建模:平衡定性理解与定量问题的挑战与建议
Syst Dyn Rev. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4). doi: 10.1002/sdr.1765. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Differences in Risks for Recurrent Injury and Death Among Survivors of Violence by Homeless Status.无家可归者暴力幸存者在再次受伤和死亡风险方面的差异。
J Urban Health. 2023 Oct;100(5):972-983. doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00781-4. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
System dynamics applications to injury and violence prevention: a systematic review.系统动力学在伤害与暴力预防中的应用:一项系统综述
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2019 Jun 15;6:248-262. doi: 10.1007/s40471-019-00200-w. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
Alcohol or Drug Use and Trauma Recidivism.酒精或药物使用与创伤再发
Nurs Res. 2017 Sep/Oct;66(5):399-404. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000231.
3
Effect of a brief intervention for alcohol and illicit drug use on trauma recidivism in a cohort of trauma patients.针对创伤患者队列中酒精和非法药物使用的简短干预对创伤再发的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0182441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182441. eCollection 2017.
4
Long-term evaluation of a hospital-based violence intervention program using a regional health information exchange.使用区域健康信息交换对基于医院的暴力干预项目进行长期评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jan;84(1):175-182. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001671.
5
Violent trauma recidivism: Does all violence escalate?暴力创伤再犯:所有暴力行为都会升级吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Dec;44(6):851-858. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0787-5. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Trauma recidivism at an emergency department of a Swedish medical center.瑞典一家医疗中心急诊科的创伤再发情况。
Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0087-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
7
Risk factors for recurrent violent injury among black men.黑人男性反复遭受暴力伤害的风险因素。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Trauma Recidivism Predicts Long-term Mortality: Missed Opportunities for Prevention (Retrospective Cohort Study).创伤再发预示长期死亡率:预防的错失机遇(回顾性队列研究)
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):847-853. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001823.
9
Preventing Violence Among High-Risk Youth and Communities with Economic, Policy, and Structural Strategies.运用经济、政策和结构策略预防高危青年及社区中的暴力行为。
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):57-60. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6501a9.
10
Urban versus rural trauma recidivism: is there a difference?城市与农村创伤再发率:有差异吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec;40(6):701-6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0355-6. Epub 2013 Nov 26.