Faculty of Law and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 22;38(4):840-846. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.085. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
In 2017, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization's Assessment Report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan noted the need to "better document the ways in which legislation and regulations have been used to promote or undermine immunization at the national level". Despite National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) now existing in over 134 countries worldwide, there has been very little academic consideration of their legal underpinnings. In this paper, we compare the legal foundations and authority of 28 NITAGs from the six WHO Regions. All are members of the Global NITAG Network. We categorize the NITAGs based on their legal foundation and on the authority granted to them by their government, organizing them into a taxonomy of models. We then propose legal considerations for governments contemplating establishing or reforming a NITAG.
2017 年,免疫战略咨询专家组(SAGE)的全球疫苗行动计划评估报告指出,需要“更好地记录立法和监管法规在国家层面上促进或破坏免疫接种的方式”。尽管现在全球有超过 134 个国家都设有国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG),但很少有学术研究关注其法律基础。本文比较了来自世卫组织六个区域的 28 个 NITAG 的法律基础和权限。这些 NITAG 均为全球 NITAG 网络的成员。我们根据其法律基础以及政府赋予他们的权限对 NITAG 进行分类,将它们组织成一个模型分类法。然后,我们为考虑建立或改革 NITAG 的政府提出了法律方面的考虑。