• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机行为改变试验中的入组延迟:个体参与者数据荟萃分析显示与失访相关,但与效应大小无关。

Enrolment-latency in randomized behavior change trials: individual participant data meta-analysis showed association with attrition but not effect-size.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Deakin Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.019
PMID:31706962
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nonresponse can bias prevalence estimates in population surveys. Effects of selective participation in behavior change intervention trials have been little studied. We tested hypotheses that trial participants who are hard to recruit are (1) more likely to be lost-to-follow-up and (2) less responsive to intervention.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We undertook a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis of four alcohol intervention trials involving 9,251 university students in Australia, New Zealand, and Sweden, comparing participants who enrolled "late" (after the final invitation to participate) vs. "early" (before that). Outcomes were whether participants completed assessments at each trial's primary endpoint (late/early) and number of drinks consumed per week (intervention/control) among late enrolees vs. early enrolees.

RESULTS

Late enrolees were more likely to be lost-to-follow-up than early enrolees (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.7, 2.9). Intervention effect estimates were smaller for late vs. early enrolees, but not significantly so (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.08).

CONCLUSION

Greater effort to recruit trial participants was associated with higher attrition, but there was no clear evidence of bias in effect estimation. The possibility that intervention effect estimates do not generalize beyond a relatively compliant minority of trial participants may warrant further study.

摘要

目的

无应答可能会使人群调查中的患病率估计产生偏差。行为改变干预试验中选择性参与的影响研究甚少。我们检验了以下假设:难以招募的试验参与者(1)更有可能失访,(2)对干预的反应性较低。

研究设计和设置

我们对涉及澳大利亚、新西兰和瑞典的四所大学的 9251 名学生的四项酒精干预试验进行了两阶段个体参与者数据荟萃分析,比较了“晚期”(最后一次参加试验的邀请后)和“早期”(在此之前)参与者。结果是在每个试验的主要终点(晚期/早期)中,参与者是否完成了评估,以及晚期入组者与早期入组者相比每周饮酒量(干预/对照)。

结果

晚期入组者比早期入组者更有可能失访(OR 2.3,95%CI:1.7, 2.9)。晚期入组者与早期入组者相比,干预效果估计值较小,但差异无统计学意义(RR=0.93;95%CI:0.79, 1.08)。

结论

更大的努力招募试验参与者与更高的脱落率相关,但在效果估计中没有明显的偏差证据。干预效果估计值是否不能推广到试验参与者中相对顺从的少数群体之外,这一可能性可能需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Enrolment-latency in randomized behavior change trials: individual participant data meta-analysis showed association with attrition but not effect-size.随机行为改变试验中的入组延迟:个体参与者数据荟萃分析显示与失访相关,但与效应大小无关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users.减少同时存在酒精问题和非法药物使用问题者饮酒量的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 3(12):CD009269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009269.pub3.
3
Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.评估随机对照试验中脱落的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
Differential attrition in health behaviour change trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.健康行为改变试验中的差异性损耗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):122-34. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.953526.
5
Early participant attrition from clinical trials: role of trial design and logistics.临床试验中的早期参与者损耗:试验设计与后勤保障的作用
Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):328-35. doi: 10.1177/1740774508094406.
6
7
Describing the participants in a study.描述一项研究中的参与者。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):576-581. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx054.
8
Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome.慢性疲劳综合征的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub7.
9
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub3.
10
Randomized trial seeking to induce the Hawthorne effect found no evidence for any effect on self-reported alcohol consumption online.随机试验试图诱导霍桑效应,但在线上自我报告的酒精摄入量方面没有发现任何影响的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant and trial characteristics reported in predictive analyses of trial attrition: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials across multiple conditions.在试验损耗的预测分析中报告的参与者和试验特征:对多种情况下随机对照试验系统评价的伞状综述
Trials. 2025 Mar 12;26(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08794-x.
2
Effects of a waiting list control design on alcohol consumption among online help-seekers: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.等待名单对照设计对在线求助者饮酒行为的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e049810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049810.