• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右冠状动脉麦角新碱激发试验的可行性。

Feasibility of right coronary artery first ergonovine provocation test.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2021 Feb;76(1):38-45. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1687966. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1080/00015385.2019.1687966
PMID:31707937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary (IC) provocation angiography is recommended when variant angina is suspected. However, specific procedure-related factors remain uncertain.

METHODS

Intracoronary ergonovine infusion was used for the provocation test. About 10, 20, and 40 μg of ergonovine were sequentially injected into the right coronary artery (RCA). During a negative or intermediate response or depending on the clinician's discretion, the left coronary artery (LCA) was injected with incremental doses of 20, 40, and 80 μg of ergonovine or vice versa. If significant coronary spasm or positive clinical findings were noted, the test was stopped immediately and IC nitroglycerine was injected.

RESULTS

We reviewed a total of 725 patients (male: 402; mean age: 58.5 years). Spasm-positive response was observed in 269 patients (37.1%), intermediate response in 113 patients (15.6%), and negative response in 343 patients (47.3%). The right radial artery approach was used in most cases (92.6%), and the RCA first approach was mainly chosen (95.0%). The provocation results in the RCA and LCA (93.4%, 381/408) were highly consistent, and the clinically significant discrepancy rate (RCA positive/LCA negative or RCA negative/LCA positive) was 1.5% (6/408). The RCA-alone provocation test can identify spasm-positive response in 93.4% of the patients (228/244). The mean procedure time was 39.9 ± 11.0 min, and approximately 3.3% (24/725) of the patients developed acute complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The RCA-first IC ergonovine provocation test is feasible, and the RCA-alone spasm provocation could be acceptable except in an intermediate response, highly clinically suspected cases, or high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

当怀疑变异性心绞痛时,建议进行冠状动脉内(IC)激发血管造影。然而,特定的与操作相关的因素仍不确定。

方法

使用 IC 麦角新碱输注进行激发试验。约 10、20 和 40μg 麦角新碱依次注入右冠状动脉(RCA)。在阴性或中间反应时,或根据临床医生的判断,左冠状动脉(LCA)注入递增剂量的 20、40 和 80μg 麦角新碱,或反之亦然。如果注意到明显的冠状动脉痉挛或阳性的临床发现,试验立即停止并注入 IC 硝酸甘油。

结果

我们共回顾了 725 例患者(男性:402 例;平均年龄:58.5 岁)。269 例(37.1%)患者出现痉挛阳性反应,113 例(15.6%)患者出现中间反应,343 例(47.3%)患者出现阴性反应。大多数情况下采用右桡动脉入路(92.6%),主要选择 RCA 首先入路(95.0%)。RCA 和 LCA 的激发结果(93.4%,381/408)高度一致,临床显著差异率(RCA 阳性/LCA 阴性或 RCA 阴性/LCA 阳性)为 1.5%(6/408)。单独 RCA 激发试验可识别 93.4%(228/244)的痉挛阳性反应患者。平均操作时间为 39.9±11.0min,约 3.3%(24/725)的患者发生急性并发症。

结论

RCA 首先的 IC 麦角新碱激发试验是可行的,除中间反应、高度疑似病例或高危患者外,单独 RCA 痉挛激发也可以接受。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of right coronary artery first ergonovine provocation test.右冠状动脉麦角新碱激发试验的可行性。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Feb;76(1):38-45. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1687966. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
2
Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing.序贯冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱和麦角新碱给药在痉挛激发试验中的安全性和潜在有用性。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17539447241233168. doi: 10.1177/17539447241233168.
3
Induction of coronary artery spasm by two pharmacological agents: comparison between intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine.两种药理药物诱发冠状动脉痉挛:冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱与麦角新碱的比较
Coron Artery Dis. 2003 Sep;14(6):451-7. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200309000-00006.
4
Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm.用于诊断多支血管冠状动脉痉挛的激发试验的安全性及最佳方案。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Feb;31(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0591-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
5
The effect of intracoronary administration of ergonovine on the contralateral coronary artery in a provocation test for the diagnosis of variant angina.冠状动脉内注射麦角新碱在诊断变异型心绞痛激发试验中对侧冠状动脉的影响。
Acta Cardiol. 2014 Dec;69(6):628-34. doi: 10.1080/ac.69.6.1000005.
6
Gender differences in sensitivity of acetylcholine and ergonovine to coronary spasm provocation test.乙酰胆碱和麦角新碱对冠状动脉痉挛激发试验敏感性的性别差异。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Mar;31(3):322-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0614-4. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
7
Sequential spasm provocation tests might overcome a limitation of the standard spasm provocation tests.序贯性痉挛激发试验可能会克服标准痉挛激发试验的一个局限性。
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Sep;26(6):490-4. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000267.
8
Relation of Vasoreactivity in the Left and Right Coronary Arteries During Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Testing.在乙酰胆碱痉挛激发试验中左、右冠状动脉血管反应性的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 May 15;219:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.03.020. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
Clinical impact of selective spasm provocation tests: comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine in 1508 examinations.选择性痉挛激发试验的临床影响:1508例检查中乙酰胆碱与麦角新碱的比较
Coron Artery Dis. 2004 Dec;15(8):491-7. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200412000-00006.
10
The 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Positive or Intermediate Results in the Intracoronary Ergonovine Provocation Test.冠状动脉内麦角新碱激发试验阳性或中间结果患者的 24 个月预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):914-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.249. Epub 2015 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Coronary Artery Should Be Preferred for Starting the Coronary Spasm Provocation Test?冠状动脉痉挛激发试验应首选哪支冠状动脉开始?
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;13(10):2072. doi: 10.3390/life13102072.
2
Coronary Vasospastic Angina: A Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.冠状动脉痉挛性心绞痛:发病机制、诊断及管理综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;12(8):1124. doi: 10.3390/life12081124.