Pacchierotti Francesca, Masumura Kenichi, Eastmond David A, Elhajouji Azeddine, Froetschl Roland, Kirsch-Volders Micheline, Lynch Anthony, Schuler Maik, Tweats David, Marchetti Francesco
Health Protection Technology Division, Laboratory of Biosafety and Risk Assessment, ENEA, CR Casaccia, Rome, Italy.
Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2019 Dec;848:403023. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
As part of the 7th International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing held in Tokyo, Japan in November 2017, a workgroup of experts reviewed and assessed the risk of aneugens for human health. The present manuscript is one of three manuscripts from the workgroup and reports on the unanimous consensus reached on the evidence for aneugens affecting germ cells, their mechanisms of action and role in hereditary diseases. There are 24 chemicals with strong or sufficient evidence for germ cell aneugenicity providing robust support for the ability of chemicals to induce germ cell aneuploidy. Interference with microtubule dynamics or inhibition of topoisomerase II function are clear characteristics of germ cell aneugens. Although there are mechanisms of chromosome segregation that are unique to germ cells, there is currently no evidence for germ cell-specific aneugens. However, the available data are heavily skewed toward chemicals that are aneugenic in somatic cells. Development of high-throughput screening assays in suitable animal models for exploring additional targets for aneuploidy induction, such as meiosis-specific proteins, and to prioritize chemicals for the potential to be germ cell aneugens is encouraged. Evidence in animal models support that: oocytes are more sensitive than spermatocytes and somatic cells to aneugens; exposure to aneugens leads to aneuploid conceptuses; and, the frequencies of aneuploidy are similar in germ cells and zygotes. Although aneuploidy in germ cells is a significant cause of infertility and pregnancy loss in humans, there is currently limited evidence that aneugens induce hereditary diseases in human populations because the great majority of aneuploid conceptuses die in utero. Overall, the present work underscores the importance of protecting the human population from exposure to chemicals that can induce aneuploidy in germ cells that, in contrast to carcinogenicity, is directly linked to an adverse outcome.
作为2017年11月在日本东京举行的第七届遗传毒性测试国际研讨会的一部分,一个专家工作组对人类健康的非整倍体原的风险进行了审查和评估。本手稿是该工作组的三篇手稿之一,报告了就非整倍体原影响生殖细胞的证据、其作用机制以及在遗传性疾病中的作用达成的一致共识。有24种化学物质有确凿或充分的证据表明具有生殖细胞非整倍体原性,有力地支持了化学物质诱导生殖细胞非整倍体的能力。干扰微管动力学或抑制拓扑异构酶II功能是生殖细胞非整倍体原的明显特征。虽然存在生殖细胞特有的染色体分离机制,但目前尚无生殖细胞特异性非整倍体原的证据。然而,现有数据严重偏向于在体细胞中具有非整倍体原性的化学物质。鼓励在合适的动物模型中开发高通量筛选试验,以探索非整倍体诱导的其他靶点,如减数分裂特异性蛋白,并对可能成为生殖细胞非整倍体原的化学物质进行优先级排序。动物模型中的证据支持:卵母细胞比精母细胞和体细胞对非整倍体原更敏感;接触非整倍体原会导致非整倍体胚胎;并且,生殖细胞和受精卵中的非整倍体频率相似。虽然生殖细胞中的非整倍体是人类不孕和流产的重要原因,但目前仅有有限证据表明非整倍体原会在人群中诱发遗传性疾病,因为绝大多数非整倍体胚胎会在子宫内死亡。总体而言,本研究强调了保护人类免受可诱导生殖细胞非整倍体的化学物质暴露的重要性,与致癌性不同,这直接与不良后果相关。