• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在客观测试中更改答案是否划算?

Does it pay to change answers on objective tests?

作者信息

Brittin H C, Mistry A N

机构信息

Food and Nutrition Section, College of Home Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1988 Oct;88(10):1283-4.

PMID:3171024
Abstract

Changing answers on objective tests in a university food and nutrition course was investigated. Responses to 4% of the questions were changed, with a 3:1 ratio of wrong-to-right to right-to-wrong changes. Most students changed at least one answer on each test. More students gained than lost points by changing answers, with a 3:1 ratio of those gaining to those losing. Sex and changing answers usually were not related. Students with the highest grades made the fewest changes. Teachers should advise students to change answers on objective tests in food and nutrition if, after reconsideration, another answer seems better.

摘要

对大学食品与营养课程中客观测试题答案的更改情况进行了调查。4%的问题答案被更改,答错改对与答对改答错的比例为3:1。大多数学生在每次测试中至少更改了一个答案。更改答案后,得分增加的学生多于得分减少的学生,二者比例为3:1。性别与更改答案通常无关。成绩最高的学生更改答案的次数最少。教师应建议食品与营养课程客观测试中的学生,如果经过重新思考后觉得另一个答案更好,就更改答案。

相似文献

1
Does it pay to change answers on objective tests?在客观测试中更改答案是否划算?
J Am Diet Assoc. 1988 Oct;88(10):1283-4.
2
An analysis of response changes on objective test questions.对客观测试题答案变化的分析。
J Allied Health. 1985 May;14(2):213-222.
3
[Antecedents for the teaching of nutrition in the Chilean school system].
Educ Med Salud. 1983;17(2):163-72.
4
Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!在多项选择题评估中改变答案——有疑问时就改变那个答案——并传播这个消息!
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Aug 24;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-28.
5
Analysis of answer changes by dental students on multiple choice tests in pathology: attack on an educational myth.牙科学生在病理学多项选择题测试中答案变化的分析:对一个教育神话的抨击
J Dent Educ. 1979 Mar;43(3):159-64.
6
Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.在高风险医学考试中回答多项选择题。
Med Educ. 2005 Sep;39(9):890-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02243.x.
7
An assessment of the nutrition education of students in grades 3 to 12.对三至十二年级学生营养教育情况的评估。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1984 Jan;84(1):59-63.
8
Student interaction characteristics during collaborative group testing.协作小组测试期间的学生互动特征。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):24-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.90161.2008.
9
Food choices of healthy school-age children.
J Sch Nurs. 1995 Dec;11(4):17-8, 20.
10
Clinical nutrition: inadequate teaching in medical schools.临床营养学:医学院校教学不足。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2001 Apr;11(2):104-7.