Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.
Behav Genet. 2020 Jan;50(1):67-71. doi: 10.1007/s10519-019-09979-2. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Using data from 5500 adolescents from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Domingue et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci 25:256., 2018) claimed to show that friends are genetically more similar to one another than randomly selected peers, beyond the confounding effects of population stratification by ancestry. The authors also claimed to show 'social-genetic' effects, whereby individuals' educational attainment (EA) is influenced by their friends' genes. We argue that neither claim is justified by the data. Mathematically we show that (1) the genetic similarity reported between friends is far larger than theoretically possible if it was caused by phenotypic assortment as the authors claim; uncontrolled population stratification is a likely reason for the genetic similarity they observed, and (2) significant association between individuals' EA and their friends' polygenic scores for EA is a necessary consequence of EA similarity among friends, and does not provide evidence for social-genetic effects. Going forward, we urge caution in the analysis and interpretation of data at the intersection of human genetics and the social sciences.
多明格斯等人利用来自国家青少年健康纵向研究的 5500 名青少年的数据,声称表明朋友之间的遗传相似度要高于随机选择的同龄人,这超出了基于祖先的人口分层的混杂影响。作者还声称表明了“社会遗传”效应,即个体的受教育程度(EA)受其朋友基因的影响。我们认为,这些数据都不能证明这两个说法是合理的。从数学上我们表明(1)作者声称的朋友之间遗传相似性远大于理论上如果由表型分类引起的可能性;未控制的人口分层是他们观察到遗传相似性的一个可能原因;(2)个体的 EA 和他们朋友的 EA 多基因分数之间的显著关联是朋友之间 EA 相似性的必然结果,而不能为社会遗传效应提供证据。今后,我们敦促在人类遗传学和社会科学交叉领域的数据分析和解释中保持谨慎。