• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米非司酮药物流产在加拿大的实施:一项评估促进因素和障碍的调查的试点及可行性测试

Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers.

作者信息

Devane Courtney, Renner Regina M, Munro Sarah, Guilbert Édith, Dunn Sheila, Wagner Marie-Soleil, Norman Wendy V

机构信息

1Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada.

2School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 8;5:126. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0520-8. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-019-0520-8
PMID:31720004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6839244/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct primary care provision of first-trimester medical abortion could potentially address inequitable abortion access in Canada. However, when Health Canada approved the combination medication Mifegymiso® (mifepristone 200 mg/misoprostol 800 mcg) for medical abortion in July 2015, we hypothesized that the restrictions to distribution, prescribing, and dispensing would impede the uptake of this evidence-based innovation in primary care. We developed and pilot-tested a survey related to policy and practice facilitators and barriers to assess successful initiation and ongoing clinical provision of medical abortion service by physicians undertaking mifepristone training. Additionally, we explored expert, stakeholder, and physician perceptions of the impact of facilitators and barriers on abortion services throughout Canada.

METHODS

In phase 1, we developed a survey using 2 theoretical frameworks: Greenhalgh's conceptual model for the Diffusion of Innovations in health service organizations (which we operationalized) and Godin's framework to assess the impact of professional development on the uptake of new practices operationalized in Légaré's validated questionnaire. We finalized questions in phase 2 using the modified Delphi methodology. The survey was then tested by an expert panel of 25 nationally representative physician participants and 4 clinical content experts. Qualitative analysis of transcripts enriched and validated the content by identifying these potential barriers: physicians dispensing the medication, mandatory training to become a prescriber, burdens for patients, lack of remuneration for mifepristone provision, and services available in my community. To assess the usability and reliability of the online survey, in phase 3, we pilot-tested the survey for feasibility.

RESULTS

We developed and tested a 61-item Mifepristone Implementation Survey suitable to study the facilitators and barriers to implementation of mifepristone first-trimester medical abortion practice by physicians in Canada.

CONCLUSIONS

Our team operationalized Greenhalgh's theoretical framework for Diffusion of Innovations in health systems to explore factors influencing the implementation of first-trimester medical abortion provision. This process may be useful for those evaluating other health system innovations. Identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation of mifepristone practice in Canada and knowledge translation has the potential to inform regulatory and health system changes to support and scale up facilitators and mitigate barriers to equitable medical abortion provision.

摘要

背景

在加拿大,由直接初级保健提供孕早期药物流产服务可能有助于解决堕胎服务获取不平等的问题。然而,当加拿大卫生部于2015年7月批准将复方药物米非司酮米索前列醇片(米非司酮200毫克/米索前列醇800微克)用于药物流产时,我们推测,在药物分发、处方开具和配药方面的限制会阻碍这种基于证据的创新在初级保健中的应用。我们开发并进行了一项关于政策及实践促进因素和障碍的调查,以评估接受米非司酮培训的医生成功启动并持续提供药物流产服务的情况。此外,我们还探讨了专家、利益相关者和医生对促进因素和障碍对加拿大各地堕胎服务影响的看法。

方法

在第一阶段,我们利用两个理论框架开发了一项调查:格林哈尔希的卫生服务组织创新扩散概念模型(我们将其进行了实际应用)以及戈丁的框架(该框架通过勒加雷经验证的问卷来评估专业发展对新实践应用的影响)。在第二阶段,我们采用改进的德尔菲法确定了最终的问题。随后,该调查由一个由25名具有全国代表性的医生参与者和4名临床内容专家组成的专家小组进行测试。通过对访谈记录的定性分析,识别出了这些潜在障碍,从而丰富并验证了调查内容:医生配药、成为处方开具者的强制培训、患者负担、提供米非司酮缺乏报酬以及所在社区可获得的服务。为了评估在线调查的可用性和可靠性,在第三阶段,我们对该调查进行了可行性预测试。

结果

我们开发并测试了一项包含61个条目的米非司酮实施情况调查,该调查适用于研究加拿大医生实施米非司酮孕早期药物流产实践的促进因素和障碍。

结论

我们的团队运用了格林哈尔希的卫生系统创新扩散理论框架,以探索影响孕早期药物流产服务实施的因素。这一过程可能对评估其他卫生系统创新的人员有所帮助。识别加拿大米非司酮实践实施的促进因素和障碍以及知识转化,有可能为监管和卫生系统变革提供参考,以支持并扩大促进因素的作用,减轻公平提供药物流产服务的障碍。

相似文献

1
Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers.米非司酮药物流产在加拿大的实施:一项评估促进因素和障碍的调查的试点及可行性测试
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 8;5:126. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0520-8. eCollection 2019.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of First Trimester Medical Abortion With Mifepristone in the Province of Québec: A Qualitative Investigation.魁北克省实施米非司酮早期药物流产的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 May;42(5):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.10.037. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.米非司酮的实施能否解决加拿大城乡堕胎机会不平等问题:一项混合方法实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e028443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028443.
4
Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study.加拿大医生对影响米非司酮药物流产实施因素的看法:一项全国性定性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Sep;18(5):413-421. doi: 10.1370/afm.2562.
5
Pharmacist dispensing of the abortion pill in Canada: Diffusion of Innovation meets integrated knowledge translation.加拿大药剂师配发堕胎药:创新扩散与综合知识转化的相遇。
Implement Sci. 2021 Aug 3;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01144-w.
6
A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study.支持医生采用新堕胎实践的实践社区:混合方法案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 5;24(5):e34302. doi: 10.2196/34302.
7
Pharmacist direct dispensing of mifepristone for medication abortion in Canada: a survey of community pharmacists.在加拿大,药剂师直接配发米非司酮用于药物流产:一项对社区药剂师的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e063370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063370.
8
Integrating mifepristone into primary care in Canada's capital: A multi-methods exploration of the Medical Abortion Access Project.将米非司酮纳入加拿大首都的初级保健:医疗流产准入项目的多方法探索。
Contraception. 2022 May;109:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Provision of first-trimester medication abortion in 2019: Results from the Canadian abortion provider survey.2019年孕早期药物流产的提供情况:加拿大堕胎提供者调查结果
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.020. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
10
Slow implementation of mifepristone medical termination of pregnancy in Quebec, Canada: a qualitative investigation.加拿大魁北克米非司酮药物流产实施缓慢:一项定性研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Jun;25(3):190-198. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1743825. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse practitioner medication abortion providers in Canada: results from a national survey.加拿大执业护士药物流产提供者:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 9;51(2):102-110. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202379.
2
Development and pilot testing of the 2019 Canadian Abortion Provider Survey.2019年加拿大堕胎服务提供者调查的开展与试点测试。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Mar 23;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01279-1.
3
Increasing the availability of long-acting reversible contraception and medical abortion in primary care: the Australian Contraception and Abortion Primary Care Practitioner Support Network (AusCAPPS) cohort study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
When there are no abortion laws: A case study of Canada.无堕胎法时的情况:以加拿大为例。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 25.
2
Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.米非司酮的实施能否解决加拿大城乡堕胎机会不平等问题:一项混合方法实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e028443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028443.
3
First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.
提高初级保健中长效可逆避孕措施和药物流产的可及性:澳大利亚避孕与流产初级保健从业者支持网络(AusCAPPS)队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):e065583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065583.
4
Abortion services and providers in Canada in 2019: results of a national survey.2019 年加拿大的堕胎服务和提供者:全国调查结果。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 27;10(3):E856-E864. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210232. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
5
A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study.支持医生采用新堕胎实践的实践社区:混合方法案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 5;24(5):e34302. doi: 10.2196/34302.
6
Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review.使用CPD反应问卷评估卫生专业人员的继续职业发展活动:系统评价
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 May 2;8(2):e36948. doi: 10.2196/36948.
7
Pharmacist checklist and resource guide for mifepristone medical abortion: User-centred development and testing.米非司酮药物流产的药剂师核对清单及资源指南:以用户为中心的开发与测试
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021 May 28;154(3):166-174. doi: 10.1177/17151635211005503. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
8
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.米非司酮治疗低危剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的超声造影评估。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2020 Oct 31;2020:3725353. doi: 10.1155/2020/3725353. eCollection 2020.
9
Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.米非司酮的实施能否解决加拿大城乡堕胎机会不平等问题:一项混合方法实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e028443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028443.
美国和加拿大的孕早期药物流产实践。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186487. eCollection 2017.
4
Abortion health services in Canada: Results of a 2012 national survey.加拿大的堕胎健康服务:2012年全国调查结果
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Apr;62(4):e209-e217.
5
First-trimester medical abortion practices in Canada: National survey.加拿大孕早期药物流产实践:全国性调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Apr;62(4):e201-e208.
6
The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence.澳大利亚堕胎的法律和非法律障碍:证据综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Apr;22(2):114-122. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Access, equity and costs of induced abortion services in Australia: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚人工流产服务的可及性、公平性与成本:一项横断面研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Jun;41(3):309-314. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12641. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
Requiring physicians to dispense mifepristone: an unnecessary limit on safety and access to medical abortion.要求医生配发米非司酮:对药物流产安全性和可及性的不必要限制。
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E429-E430. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160581. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
9
'…a one stop shop in their own community': Medical abortion and the role of general practice.“……在其所在社区提供一站式服务”:药物流产与全科医疗的作用
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Dec;56(6):648-654. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12507. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Medical Abortion.药物流产
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Apr;38(4):366-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Apr 23.