Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, MATEIS UMR CNRS 5510, 7 Avenue Jean Capelle, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Department of Oral Health Sciences, BIOMAT -Biomaterials Research Group & UZ Leuven (University Hospitals Leuven), Dentistry, Kapucijnenvoer 7 blok a, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, Berlin, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2019 Dec;35(12):1776-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
To evaluate two-body wear of three zirconia ceramics stabilized with 3, 4 and 5mol% yttria and to compare their wear behavior with that of a lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic.
Sixteen rectangular-shaped specimens made from three grades of zirconia ceramics and a lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic were polished and dynamically loaded in a chewing simulator (2kg vertical load, 2.1Hz) under water at 90°C for 1.2×10 cycles (about 7 days) in the ball-on-plate mode against steatite antagonists. Surface roughness was measured before and after wear testing. Wear tracks were scanned with a non-contact 3D profilometer and super-impositions were used to determine wear loss of the antagonists. Wear surfaces were imaged by SEM. XRD and micro-Raman spectroscopy were used to characterize phase transformation and stress status in the worn and unworn areas of the zirconia ceramics.
Independent of fracture toughness, strength and aging-susceptibility, the three zirconia ceramics showed a similar and limited amount of wear (∼10μm in depth) and were more wear-resistant than the lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (∼880μm in depth). Abrasive wear without obvious cracks was observed for all investigated zirconias, whereas the glass-ceramic with a lower fatigue threshold and high susceptibility to surface dissolution exhibited significant abrasion, fatigue and corrosion wear. All three zirconia ceramics yielded a lower antagonist wear than the glass-ceramic and no significant differences were found between the zirconia ceramics.
In the context of this study, high-translucent zirconia ceramics stabilized with a higher yttria content, recently introduced in the dental field, were as wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly as conventional high-strength zirconia and suitable for monolithic restorations.
评估三种分别添加 3mol%、4mol%和 5mol%氧化钇的氧化锆陶瓷的三体磨耗,并将其磨耗行为与锂硅玻璃陶瓷进行比较。
用 3 种氧化锆陶瓷和 1 种锂硅玻璃陶瓷制备 16 个矩形试件,经抛光后在咀嚼模拟器中进行动态加载(2kg 垂直载荷,2.1Hz),90°C 下,水介质中,球对盘模式下,模拟 7 天(约 1.2×10 循环)。在磨损测试前和测试后测量表面粗糙度。用非接触式 3D 轮廓仪扫描磨损轨迹,对叠加图像进行分析,以确定对磨剂的磨损量。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察磨损表面形貌。用 X 射线衍射(XRD)和微拉曼光谱分析(micro-Raman spectroscopy)研究氧化锆陶瓷的磨损区和未磨损区的相转变和残余应力状态。
在断裂韧性、强度和老化敏感性等方面各不相同的情况下,3 种氧化锆陶瓷的磨损量(深度约 10μm)相近且有限,比锂硅玻璃陶瓷(深度约 880μm)更耐磨。所有研究的氧化锆均表现出无明显裂纹的磨料磨损,而疲劳阈值较低、表面溶解敏感性较高的玻璃陶瓷则表现出明显的磨料磨损、疲劳磨损和腐蚀磨损。3 种氧化锆陶瓷的对磨剂磨损均低于玻璃陶瓷,且 3 种氧化锆陶瓷之间无显著差异。
在本研究中,最近引入牙科领域的高透光氧化锆陶瓷,添加了更高氧化钇的含量,与传统高强度氧化锆一样耐磨且对邻接体友好,适合用于单冠修复。