• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用连续倒刺缝线技术行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后留置导尿管理想的拔除时机:425 例连续患者的前瞻性分析。

Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology and Andrology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Wien, Johannes-von-Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Sep;38(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4
PMID:31728670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7423851/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare prospectively early outcome and complications of catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on the 4th or 7th day with a standardized running barbed suture technique.

INTRODUCTION

The time point of removing the indwelling catheter after RARP mainly depends on institute's/surgeon's preferences. Removal should be late enough to avoid urinary leakage and complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR) but early enough to avoid unnecessary catheter indwelling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive single-institutional series of patients underwent RARP between July 2015 and August 2017 and were entered in a prospectively maintained data base. Between July 2015 and December 2016 a cystogram was performed on 7th postoperative day (group A), thereafter the cystogram was performed on 4th postoperative day (group B). Incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), urinary tract infections (UTI) and adverse events between the two cohorts was compared.

RESULTS

425 patients were analyzed (group A: n = 231; group B: n = 194). Both cohorts were comparable regarding demographic and oncological parameters. Watertight anastomosis was present in 84.8% in group A and in 82.5% in group B, respectively. AUR within 4 weeks after RARP occurred in 2.2% (n = 3) in A and 9.4% (n = 15) in B (p = 0.001). AUR within 72 h after catheter removal occurred in group A: 1% (n = 2) and in group B: 6.3% (n = 10) (p = 0.005). Symptomatic urinary tract infections occurred in 8.2% (n = 16) in group A and in 6.9% (n = 11) in group B. There were no differences in the rate of secondary anastomosis dehiscence. Age, BMI, prostate size, surgeon, or intraoperative bladder neck reconstruction were not correlated to the occurrence of AUR or UTI.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of indwelling catheter on day 4 after a RARP with a running barbed suture shows similar anastomosis leakage rates as on the 7th postoperative day. However, AUR rates are higher for early removal. Patients scheduled for early removal should be carefully informed about the increased risk for AUR. Catheter indwelling time does not represent a risk factor for UTI.

摘要

目的

前瞻性比较机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后第 4 天或第 7 天用标准化的滑线缝合技术拔除导尿管的早期结果和并发症。

简介

RARP 后拔除留置导尿管的时间点主要取决于机构/外科医生的偏好。拔除时间应足够晚以避免尿漏和急性尿潴留(AUR)等并发症,但也应足够早以避免不必要的留置导尿管。

材料和方法

2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 8 月,连续进行了一项单机构系列研究,患者接受了 RARP 并被纳入前瞻性维护的数据中。2015 年 7 月至 2016 年 12 月,第 7 天(A 组)行膀胱造影,此后第 4 天(B 组)行膀胱造影。比较两组患者的急性尿潴留(AUR)、尿路感染(UTI)和不良事件发生率。

结果

分析了 425 例患者(A 组:n=231;B 组:n=194)。两组患者的人口统计学和肿瘤学参数均无差异。A 组中 84.8%的吻合口为水密,B 组为 82.5%。AUR 在 RARP 后 4 周内发生在 A 组的 2.2%(n=3)和 B 组的 9.4%(n=15)(p=0.001)。A 组中,AUR 在导尿管拔除后 72 小时内发生的比例为 1%(n=2),B 组为 6.3%(n=10)(p=0.005)。A 组中有 8.2%(n=16)和 B 组中有 6.9%(n=11)出现症状性尿路感染。年龄、BMI、前列腺大小、外科医生或术中膀胱颈部重建与 AUR 或 UTI 的发生无关。

结论

使用滑线缝合技术,RARP 后第 4 天拔除导尿管与第 7 天拔除导尿管的吻合口漏率相似。然而,早期拔除导尿管的 AUR 发生率更高。计划早期拔除导尿管的患者应仔细告知其 AUR 风险增加。导尿管留置时间不是 UTI 的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/7423851/3c7bf7bf9d6e/345_2019_3001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/7423851/3c7bf7bf9d6e/345_2019_3001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82eb/7423851/3c7bf7bf9d6e/345_2019_3001_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients.采用连续倒刺缝线技术行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后留置导尿管理想的拔除时机:425 例连续患者的前瞻性分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Sep;38(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
2
Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study).机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期拔除导尿管:Aalst 技术的手术技术和结果(ECaRemA 研究)。
Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.052. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study).机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期拔除导尿管:一项前瞻性单中心随机试验(Ripreca 研究)的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.改良横纹肌括约肌重建对机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期控尿功能恢复和吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
5
Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后第3天或第4天拔除导尿管。
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):156-60. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02105-2.
6
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助前列腺根治术中的高级膀胱尿道支撑重建(ARVUS):一项两臂随机对照试验的一年功能结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
7
Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中使用带倒刺缝线对术后组织损伤及下尿路结局纵向变化的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):145-153. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5649-z. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Bidirectional Barbed Only vs Poliglecaprone Suture with Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction for Urethrovesical Anastomosis During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Does It Make Any Difference?机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中尿道膀胱吻合时使用双向倒刺线与可吸收线加横纹肌重建的比较:有区别吗?
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):944-949. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0386. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Radical retropubic prostatectomy with running vesicourethral anastomosis and early catheter removal: our experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术联合连续膀胱尿道吻合术及早期拔除导尿管:我们的经验。
Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):487-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02281.x. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
10
Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时使用带刺聚甘醇酸缝线行膀胱-尿道吻合术的前瞻性随机试验:时间缩短和成本效益。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1526-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10763.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of the timing of catheter removal on postoperative urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌根治术后导尿管拔除时机对术后尿失禁的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04075-3.
2
Predictors of bladder spasm during catheter-indwelling in discharged patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后出院患者留置导尿管期间膀胱痉挛的预测因素
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 7;43(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05515-6.
3
Prolonged indwelling catheter time after RARP does not lead to follow-up surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures.一项比较研究,纳入 10790 名接受过高度训练的外科医生进行机器人辅助和开放根治性前列腺切除术的男性,两组手术均为这些外科医生进行。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
Variation in prostate surgery costs and outcomes in the USA: robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy.美国前列腺手术费用和结果的差异:机器人辅助手术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Feb;8(3):143-155. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0109. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
RARP 后留置导尿管时间延长不会导致后续手术。
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 18;42(1):379. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05080-4.
4
Urinary tract infection after radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy on the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer: a population-based study.放疗或根治性前列腺切除术后的尿路感染对前列腺癌患者预后的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 3;23(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10869-4.
5
From quality management to quality improvement-structures, processes and outcomes.从质量管理到质量改进——结构、过程与结果
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03591-y.
根治性前列腺切除术后导管拔出时的抗生素预防:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Mar;37(3):181.e7-181.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
4
Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study).机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期拔除导尿管:一项前瞻性单中心随机试验(Ripreca 研究)的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
The impact of time to catheter removal on short-, intermediate- and long-term urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后导尿管拔除时间对短期、中期和长期尿控的影响。
World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1247-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2274-y. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
The risk of urinary retention following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on early continence outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿潴留的风险及其对早期控尿结果的影响。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Mar;12(3):E121-E125. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4649. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
7
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.腹腔镜和机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):845-853. doi: 10.1111/bju.14062. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
8
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
9
Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:全支付者出院数据库的当代分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):837-845. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.044. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
10
Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study).机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期拔除导尿管:Aalst 技术的手术技术和结果(ECaRemA 研究)。
Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.052. Epub 2015 Nov 11.