Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Mar;75(3):394-403. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated racial disparities in survival among dialysis patients in a manner that considers risk factors and mortality during the phase of kidney disease before maintenance dialysis. Our objective was to explore racial variations in survival among dialysis patients and relate them to racial differences in comorbid conditions and rates of death in the setting of kidney disease not yet requiring dialysis therapy.
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 3,288 black and white participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC), none of whom were receiving dialysis at enrollment.
Race.
Mortality.
Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between race and mortality starting at: (1) time of dialysis initiation and (2) entry into the CRIC.
During 7.1 years of median follow-up, 678 CRIC participants started dialysis. Starting from the time of dialysis initiation, blacks had lower risk for death (unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87) compared with whites. Starting from baseline CRIC enrollment, the strength of the association between some risk factors and dialysis was notably stronger for whites than blacks. For example, the HR for dialysis onset in the presence (vs absence) of heart failure at CRIC enrollment was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.01-1.68) for blacks versus 2.78 (95% CI, 1.90-4.50) for whites, suggesting differential severity of these risk factors by race. When we included deaths occurring both before and after dialysis, risk for death was higher among blacks (vs whites) starting from CRIC enrollment (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.64), but this finding was attenuated in adjusted models (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91-1.28).
Residual confounding.
The apparent survival advantage among blacks over whites treated with dialysis may be attributed to selected transition of a subset of whites with more severe comorbid conditions onto dialysis.
鲜有研究以考虑维持透析前肾病阶段的风险因素和死亡率的方式,调查透析患者的生存中存在的种族差异。我们的目的是探讨透析患者的生存中存在的种族差异,并将其与尚未需要透析治疗的肾脏病患者的合并症状况和死亡率的种族差异相关联。
回顾性队列研究。
3288 名慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)中的黑人和白人参与者,他们在入组时均未接受透析。
种族。
死亡率。
使用 Cox 比例风险回归来检查从以下两个时间点开始种族与死亡率之间的关联:(1)开始透析的时间和(2)进入 CRIC 时。
在中位随访 7.1 年期间,678 名 CRIC 参与者开始接受透析。与白人相比,从开始透析的时间点来看,黑人的死亡风险较低(未调整的 HR,0.67;95%CI,0.51-0.87)。从 CRIC 入组的基线开始,一些风险因素与透析之间的关联在白人中比黑人中要强得多。例如,在 CRIC 入组时存在(vs 不存在)心力衰竭的情况下,透析开始的 HR 为 1.30(95%CI,1.01-1.68),而黑人的 HR 为 2.78(95%CI,1.90-4.50),表明这些风险因素在种族之间的严重程度不同。当我们包括透析前后发生的死亡时,从 CRIC 入组开始,黑人的死亡风险(vs 白人)更高(HR,1.41;95%CI,1.22-1.64),但在调整模型中,这种关联减弱(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.91-1.28)。
残余混杂。
接受透析治疗的黑人比白人的生存优势可能归因于一组病情更严重的合并症白人患者选择过渡到透析。