Suppr超能文献

种族与慢性肾脏病和透析患者的死亡率:来自慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)研究的发现。

Race and Mortality in CKD and Dialysis: Findings From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Mar;75(3):394-403. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated racial disparities in survival among dialysis patients in a manner that considers risk factors and mortality during the phase of kidney disease before maintenance dialysis. Our objective was to explore racial variations in survival among dialysis patients and relate them to racial differences in comorbid conditions and rates of death in the setting of kidney disease not yet requiring dialysis therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 3,288 black and white participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC), none of whom were receiving dialysis at enrollment.

EXPOSURE

Race.

OUTCOME

Mortality.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between race and mortality starting at: (1) time of dialysis initiation and (2) entry into the CRIC.

RESULTS

During 7.1 years of median follow-up, 678 CRIC participants started dialysis. Starting from the time of dialysis initiation, blacks had lower risk for death (unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87) compared with whites. Starting from baseline CRIC enrollment, the strength of the association between some risk factors and dialysis was notably stronger for whites than blacks. For example, the HR for dialysis onset in the presence (vs absence) of heart failure at CRIC enrollment was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.01-1.68) for blacks versus 2.78 (95% CI, 1.90-4.50) for whites, suggesting differential severity of these risk factors by race. When we included deaths occurring both before and after dialysis, risk for death was higher among blacks (vs whites) starting from CRIC enrollment (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.64), but this finding was attenuated in adjusted models (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91-1.28).

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

The apparent survival advantage among blacks over whites treated with dialysis may be attributed to selected transition of a subset of whites with more severe comorbid conditions onto dialysis.

摘要

背景与目的

鲜有研究以考虑维持透析前肾病阶段的风险因素和死亡率的方式,调查透析患者的生存中存在的种族差异。我们的目的是探讨透析患者的生存中存在的种族差异,并将其与尚未需要透析治疗的肾脏病患者的合并症状况和死亡率的种族差异相关联。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置与参与者

3288 名慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)中的黑人和白人参与者,他们在入组时均未接受透析。

暴露

种族。

结局

死亡率。

分析方法

使用 Cox 比例风险回归来检查从以下两个时间点开始种族与死亡率之间的关联:(1)开始透析的时间和(2)进入 CRIC 时。

结果

在中位随访 7.1 年期间,678 名 CRIC 参与者开始接受透析。与白人相比,从开始透析的时间点来看,黑人的死亡风险较低(未调整的 HR,0.67;95%CI,0.51-0.87)。从 CRIC 入组的基线开始,一些风险因素与透析之间的关联在白人中比黑人中要强得多。例如,在 CRIC 入组时存在(vs 不存在)心力衰竭的情况下,透析开始的 HR 为 1.30(95%CI,1.01-1.68),而黑人的 HR 为 2.78(95%CI,1.90-4.50),表明这些风险因素在种族之间的严重程度不同。当我们包括透析前后发生的死亡时,从 CRIC 入组开始,黑人的死亡风险(vs 白人)更高(HR,1.41;95%CI,1.22-1.64),但在调整模型中,这种关联减弱(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.91-1.28)。

局限性

残余混杂。

结论

接受透析治疗的黑人比白人的生存优势可能归因于一组病情更严重的合并症白人患者选择过渡到透析。

相似文献

8
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Measures and Clinical Outcomes in CKD.生物电阻抗分析测量与慢性肾脏病的临床结局。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Nov;72(5):662-672. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

4
Is There Still a Place to Study Race in the Nephrology Space?在肾脏病学领域,研究种族问题还有立足之地吗?
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Aug 4;8(10):1907-1908. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.029. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

4
Can Collider Bias Explain Paradoxical Associations?对撞机偏差能否解释矛盾的关联?
Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):e39-e40. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000653.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验