Papermaster Amy, Champion Jane Dimmitt
The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, Texas.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019 Nov 13;33(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000322.
Curbside or informal consultations between clinicians regarding patient care occur frequently in clinical practice. Evaluation of curbside consultation (CC) among nurse practitioners (NPs) is limited.
To develop an understanding of NP perceptions of the CC process.
A qualitative descriptive design was used to assess the context of CCs among NPs. Inductive content analysis was conducted, and Atlas.ti was used to organize the data.
Purposive sampling was used to recruit 20 NPs within primary care and specialty settings.
Themes describing CC included the description of the CC process, advantages and disadvantages, documentation, legal liability, unspoken rules, and patient-centered engagement. There was a lack of consensus on the boundaries of the CC definition including difficulty in distinguishing a CC from a formal consultation. Generally, the NP acknowledges limitations and views the CC favorably as a helpful tool for receiving practical feedback and expanding learning, collegiality, and collaboration.
Findings provide insight regarding the common practice of CC in management of patients at the point of care, what it means to the NP, and a description of the breadth of the CC use. Given its potentially substantial impact on patient care, further assessment of the context of CC among NPs is obligatory.
临床医生之间就患者护理进行的床边或非正式会诊在临床实践中经常发生。对执业护士(NP)进行床边会诊(CC)的评估有限。
了解NP对CC过程的看法。
采用定性描述性设计来评估NP中CC的情况。进行归纳性内容分析,并使用Atlas.ti来组织数据。
采用目的抽样法在初级保健和专科环境中招募20名NP。
描述CC的主题包括CC过程的描述、优缺点、记录、法律责任、潜规则以及以患者为中心的参与。在CC定义的界限上缺乏共识,包括难以将CC与正式会诊区分开来。总体而言,NP认识到局限性,并将CC视为获得实际反馈以及扩展学习、同事关系和合作的有用工具。
研究结果为CC在护理点患者管理中的常见做法、对NP的意义以及CC使用的广度描述提供了见解。鉴于其对患者护理可能产生的重大影响,有必要进一步评估NP中CC的情况。