Private Practice, Sterzing, Italy.
University Clinic of Prosthodontics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;49(6):811-815. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
This investigation was conducted to analyse the usefulness of intraligamentary anaesthesia (ILA) as an alternative anaesthetic procedure in oral implantology. Forty consecutive patients with single-tooth gaps in the posterior mandible were included in the analysis. Implant insertion was performed after ILA of the gap-delimiting teeth (two injections distal to the mesial tooth, two injections mesial to the distal tooth). Implant surgery was performed successfully under ILA of the gap-delimiting teeth in 39 cases. Injection pain correlated significantly with lower periodontal probing depths (<3mm) of the delimiting teeth (P=0.003). The total amount of anaesthetic solution and the pain during surgery were significantly higher if a root canal-treated tooth was present in the area of surgery (P=0.010 and P=0.020, respectively). Overall, the mean pain score during treatment was low at 0.76±0.51 on a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. At the control visit, no major complication was encountered. All implants were successfully restored with single crowns after a healing period of 2 months. Taking into consideration the limitations of the study, ILA seems to fulfil all conditions to be defined as an alternative, minimally invasive anaesthetic technique for the insertion of single-gap implants.
本研究旨在分析牙内麻醉(intraligamentary anaesthesia,ILA)作为口腔种植学中替代麻醉程序的有效性。分析纳入了 40 名下颌后牙单个缺牙间隙的连续患者。在 ILA 麻醉缺牙间隙的邻牙(每颗牙远中及近中各注射 2 次)后,进行种植体植入。在 39 例中,通过 ILA 麻醉缺牙间隙的邻牙成功完成了种植手术。注射疼痛与邻牙牙周袋探诊深度(<3mm)呈显著相关(P=0.003)。如果手术区域存在根管治疗的牙齿,麻醉剂总量和手术期间的疼痛会显著增加(P=0.010 和 P=0.020)。总体而言,治疗过程中的平均疼痛评分为 0.76±0.51(0 到 10 的数字评分量表),疼痛程度较低。在 2 个月的愈合期后,所有种植体均成功用单冠修复。考虑到研究的局限性,ILA 似乎满足了定义为单个间隙种植体插入的替代、微创麻醉技术的所有条件。