Suppr超能文献

在首次移植后复发的 AML 患者中进行第二次异基因干细胞移植的供者选择:来自 EBMT 急性白血病工作组的研究。

Donor selection for a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients relapsing after a first transplant: a study of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.

出版信息

Blood Cancer J. 2019 Nov 18;9(12):88. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0251-3.

Abstract

Second allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT2) is a therapeutic option for patients with AML relapsing after a first transplant. Prior studies have shown similar results after SCT2 from the same or different donor; however, there are limited data on second non-T-depleted haplo-identical transplant in this setting. We retrospectively analyzed SCT2 outcomes in 556 patients, median age 46 years, relapsing after first transplant given in CR1. Patients were divided into three groups based on SCT2 donor (donor2): same donor (n = 163, sib/sib-112, UD/UD-51), different matched donor (n = 305, sib/different sib-44, sib/UD-93, UD/different UD-168), or haplo-donor (n = 88, sib/haplo-45, UD/haplo-43). Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate after SCT2 was 23.5%, 23.7%, and 21.8%, respectively (P = 0.30). Multivariate analysis showed no effect of donor2 type on relapse: hazard ratio (HR) 0.89 (P = 0.57) and 1.11 (P = 0.68) for different donor and haplo-donor compared to same donor, respectively. However, donor2 did predict for non-relapse mortality (NRM) after SCT2: HR 1.21 (P = 0.50) and 2.08 (P = 0.03), respectively, and for LFS: HR 1.00 (P = 0.97) and 1.43 (P = 0.07), respectively. In conclusion, SCT2 with the same or different matched donor is associated with similar outcomes in patients with relapsed AML. Non-T-depleted haplo-identical transplant may be associated with higher NRM, similar relapse rate and with no better results in this setting.

摘要

第二次同种异体干细胞移植(SCT2)是在第一次移植后复发的 AML 患者的治疗选择。先前的研究表明,来自同一供体或不同供体的 SCT2 后结果相似;然而,在这种情况下,关于第二次非 T 细胞耗竭半相合移植的数据有限。我们回顾性分析了 556 例中位年龄为 46 岁的患者的 SCT2 结果,这些患者在 CR1 中接受了第一次移植后复发。根据 SCT2 供体(供体 2),患者分为三组:同一供体(n=163,同胞/同胞-112,UD/UD-51)、不同匹配供体(n=305,同胞/不同同胞-44,同胞/UD-93,UD/不同 UD-168)或半相合供体(n=88,同胞/半相合-45,UD/半相合-43)。SCT2 后 2 年无白血病生存率(LFS)分别为 23.5%、23.7%和 21.8%(P=0.30)。多变量分析显示供体 2 类型对复发无影响:与同一供体相比,不同供体和半相合供体的危险比(HR)分别为 0.89(P=0.57)和 1.11(P=0.68)。然而,供体 2 确实预测了 SCT2 后的非复发死亡率(NRM):HR 分别为 1.21(P=0.50)和 2.08(P=0.03),以及 LFS:HR 分别为 1.00(P=0.97)和 1.43(P=0.07)。总之,在复发 AML 患者中,SCT2 采用同一或不同匹配供体的结果相似。非 T 细胞耗竭半相合移植可能与较高的 NRM 相关,复发率相似,在这种情况下无更好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fc/6861251/424417d0cbb4/41408_2019_251_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验