Debnam J Matthew, Vu Thinh, Sun Jia, Wei Wei, Krishnamurthy Savitri, Zafereo Mark E, Weitzman Steven P, Garg Naveen, Ahmed Salmaan
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gland Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):461-468. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.08.06.
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in vascular flow patterns between cytopathologically-proven colloid nodules and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) even when adjusting for nodule size.
Doppler vascular flow patterns in 200 colloid nodules and 166 nodules with PTC were retrospective reviewed independently by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the cytopathological results. Absence of vascular flow, perinodular and/or intranodular flow, and diffuse vascular flow were recorded. The vascular flow patterns were compared without (Fisher exact test) and with (Kruskal-Wallis test) an adjustment for nodular size. Using the most common flow pattern as the reference group, multiple logistic regression was used to compare the flow patterns. Sample skewness was calculated to determine degree of symmetry of the size distribution for each vascular flow category.
No significant difference was found in the tested vascular flow patterns between colloid nodules and PTC both without and with an adjustment for nodular size (P>0.05). Intranodular flow only was the largest group (n=111/366) and used as the reference for multiple logistic regression. No significant difference was noted between the vascular flow patterns (P>0.05). Sample skewness showed that nodules were generally smaller in size with outliers of larger size on the opposite end of the spectrum.
Independent of nodule size the absence or presence of vascular flow is not significantly different between colloid nodules and PTC. Therefore, vascular flow may not be useful in distinguishing between colloid nodules and PTC.
本研究的目的是检验以下假设:即使在对结节大小进行校正后,细胞病理学证实的胶样结节与甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)之间的血管血流模式也无显著差异。
2名对细胞病理学结果不知情的神经放射科医生对200个胶样结节和166个PTC结节的多普勒血管血流模式进行了回顾性独立分析。记录无血流、结节周围和/或结节内血流以及弥漫性血管血流情况。在不校正(Fisher精确检验)和校正(Kruskal-Wallis检验)结节大小的情况下比较血管血流模式。以最常见的血流模式作为参照组,采用多元逻辑回归比较血流模式。计算样本偏度以确定各血管血流类别大小分布的对称程度。
在不校正和校正结节大小的情况下,胶样结节和PTC的血管血流模式均无显著差异(P>0.05)。仅结节内血流是最大的组(n=111/366),用作多元逻辑回归的参照。血流模式之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。样本偏度显示,结节一般较小,在频谱另一端有较大尺寸的异常值。
与结节大小无关,胶样结节和PTC之间血管血流的有无无显著差异。因此,血管血流可能无助于区分胶样结节和PTC。