• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部穿支皮瓣与保留肌肉皮瓣用于乳房重建的比较

Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

作者信息

Butler Paris D, Wu Liza C

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.

DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08
PMID:26161306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4461709/
Abstract

Abdominally based free flaps have become the mainstay for women that desire to use their own tissue as a means of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As the techniques have evolved, significant effort has been invested in finding the best means of minimizing morbidity to the abdominal donor site while ensuring a viable reconstructed breast that is aesthetically pleasing. This manuscript reviews and compares the muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MsfTRAM), the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP), and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps, regarding flap success rate, operative times, abdominal donor site morbidity and residual functionality, hospital lengths of stay and associated costs, impact of co-morbid conditions, and resilience after adjuvant radiation treatment.

摘要

对于希望在乳房切除术后利用自身组织进行乳房重建的女性而言,腹部带蒂游离皮瓣已成为主要手段。随着技术的发展,人们投入了大量精力来寻找最佳方法,在确保重建乳房美观且存活的同时,将腹部供区的发病率降至最低。本文回顾并比较了保留肌肉的游离腹直肌肌皮瓣(MsfTRAM)、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣(SIEA),内容涉及皮瓣成功率、手术时间、腹部供区发病率和残余功能、住院时间及相关费用、合并症的影响以及辅助放疗后的恢复能力。

相似文献

1
Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.腹部穿支皮瓣与保留肌肉皮瓣用于乳房重建的比较
Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.
2
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖对采用保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
3
Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣乳房重建:与横行腹直肌肌皮瓣及腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣的前瞻性比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135328.88101.53.
4
Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.用于乳房重建的腹壁下浅动脉穿支皮瓣(SIEA)、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)和保留肌肉的横行腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)供区并发症的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Sep;122(3):702-709. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181823c15.
5
Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.术前行计算机断层血管造影以预测适合采用腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建的解剖结构良好的患者。
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):534-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3ccc.
6
[Muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction].[采用肋间动脉穿支和腹壁下动脉穿支血管化的保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣用于乳房重建]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 May 15;35(5):605-610. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202011020.
7
Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases.采用腹部皮瓣进行即刻单侧乳房重建:3310例病例分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Jan;35(1):74-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667046. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.前瞻性分析游离 TRAM、DIEP 和 SIEA 皮瓣乳房重建术后脂肪坏死与穿支血管数量的关系。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;125(5):1335-1341. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb4a.
9
A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction.一项前瞻性研究比较了 SIEA、DIEP 和保留肌肉的游离 TRAM 皮瓣对腹壁的功能影响:第二部分。双侧重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438-1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.
10
Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.即刻双侧乳房重建术采用腹部皮瓣:全国住院患者样本数据库分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Oct;35(8):594-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688719. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Donor Site Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life in Free Flap Microsurgery: An Overview.评估游离皮瓣显微手术供区并发症及其对生活质量的影响:综述
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):36. doi: 10.3390/life15010036.
2
Current Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction and the Implications of Impending Changes to Insurance Reimbursement.自体乳房重建的当前趋势以及即将到来的保险报销变化的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43855. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Transversus abdominus plane blocks do not reduce rates of postoperative prolonged opioid use following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a nationwide longitudinal analysis.腹横肌平面阻滞并不能降低腹部自体乳房重建术后长期使用阿片类药物的发生率:一项全国性纵向分析。
Eur J Plast Surg. 2023;46(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s00238-022-01996-5. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
4
Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.自体腹部皮瓣乳房重建术供区部位的发病率和并发症发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast J. 2022 Jun 24;2022:7857158. doi: 10.1155/2022/7857158. eCollection 2022.
5
Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.TRAM 或 DIEP 皮瓣后妊娠是否安全?一项关键的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2618-2630. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02289-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Preoperative Long-term Therapeutic Subcutaneous Heparin Administration into Abdomen: Possible Cause for Nonobstructive Microvascular Flap Failure.术前长期经腹部皮下注射肝素治疗:非阻塞性微血管皮瓣失败的可能原因。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 17;9(2):e3400. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003400. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Does surgical procedure type impact postoperative pain and recovery in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction?腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术中手术方式类型是否会影响术后疼痛及恢复情况?
Arch Plast Surg. 2020 Jul;47(4):324-332. doi: 10.5999/aps.2019.01417. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Use of autologous dermal flap as mesh coverage in the treatment of large abdominal-wall defect in patients following massive weight loss: presentation of a novel surgical technique.应用自体真皮皮瓣作为网片覆盖物治疗大量体重减轻后患者的大腹壁缺损:一种新的手术技术介绍。
Hernia. 2020 Apr;24(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02127-4. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases.保留肋骨技术在腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建术中显露胸廓内血管的应用:一项单中心12年215例的经验
Gland Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):477-485. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.08.08.
10
The Pedicled LICAP Flap Combined with a Free Abdominal Flap In Autologous Breast Reconstructions.带蒂横向肋间穿支皮瓣联合游离腹直肌肌皮瓣在自体乳房重建中的应用
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan 12;6(1):e1562. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001562. eCollection 2018 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖对采用保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
2
Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?自体乳房重建的发展趋势:腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣是否正在占据主导地位?
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):489-93. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000339.
3
Using propensity score analysis to compare major complications between DIEP and free muscle-sparing TRAM flap breast reconstructions.采用倾向评分分析比较 DIEP 和游离肌皮瓣 TRAM 乳房重建术的主要并发症。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr;133(4):774-782. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000024.
4
Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.相较于 DIEP 皮瓣,保留肌肉的横形腹直肌肌皮瓣并不能保护乳房重建免受乳腺癌根治术后放疗的损害。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):223-233. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436845.92623.9a.
5
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.原发性筋膜闭合联合网片加强在腹壁重建中优于桥接网片修复。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
6
Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.腹壁皮瓣游离乳房重建供区并发症的综合分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3.
7
Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.提高显微外科乳房重建的效果:一位外科医生连续完成 406 例 DIEP/TRAM 皮瓣手术的经验教训。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Aug;66(8):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
When is the deep inferior epigastric artery flap indicated for breast reconstruction in patients not treated with radiotherapy?对于未接受放疗的患者,何时适合使用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建?
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;73(1):105-13. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826cafd0.
9
The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients.游离腹部皮瓣在肥胖患者乳房重建中优于假体。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267efc5.
10
Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.接受乳腺癌根治术后放疗患者的自体组织乳房重建现状。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Aug;130(2):282-292. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182589be1.