Suppr超能文献

腹部穿支皮瓣与保留肌肉皮瓣用于乳房重建的比较

Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

作者信息

Butler Paris D, Wu Liza C

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.

Abstract

Abdominally based free flaps have become the mainstay for women that desire to use their own tissue as a means of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As the techniques have evolved, significant effort has been invested in finding the best means of minimizing morbidity to the abdominal donor site while ensuring a viable reconstructed breast that is aesthetically pleasing. This manuscript reviews and compares the muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MsfTRAM), the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP), and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps, regarding flap success rate, operative times, abdominal donor site morbidity and residual functionality, hospital lengths of stay and associated costs, impact of co-morbid conditions, and resilience after adjuvant radiation treatment.

摘要

对于希望在乳房切除术后利用自身组织进行乳房重建的女性而言,腹部带蒂游离皮瓣已成为主要手段。随着技术的发展,人们投入了大量精力来寻找最佳方法,在确保重建乳房美观且存活的同时,将腹部供区的发病率降至最低。本文回顾并比较了保留肌肉的游离腹直肌肌皮瓣(MsfTRAM)、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣(SIEA),内容涉及皮瓣成功率、手术时间、腹部供区发病率和残余功能、住院时间及相关费用、合并症的影响以及辅助放疗后的恢复能力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验