腹部穿支皮瓣与保留肌肉皮瓣用于乳房重建的比较
Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.
作者信息
Butler Paris D, Wu Liza C
机构信息
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
出版信息
Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.
Abstract
Abdominally based free flaps have become the mainstay for women that desire to use their own tissue as a means of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As the techniques have evolved, significant effort has been invested in finding the best means of minimizing morbidity to the abdominal donor site while ensuring a viable reconstructed breast that is aesthetically pleasing. This manuscript reviews and compares the muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MsfTRAM), the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP), and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps, regarding flap success rate, operative times, abdominal donor site morbidity and residual functionality, hospital lengths of stay and associated costs, impact of co-morbid conditions, and resilience after adjuvant radiation treatment.
摘要
对于希望在乳房切除术后利用自身组织进行乳房重建的女性而言，腹部带蒂游离皮瓣已成为主要手段。随着技术的发展，人们投入了大量精力来寻找最佳方法，在确保重建乳房美观且存活的同时，将腹部供区的发病率降至最低。本文回顾并比较了保留肌肉的游离腹直肌肌皮瓣（MsfTRAM）、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣（DIEP）和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣（SIEA），内容涉及皮瓣成功率、手术时间、腹部供区发病率和残余功能、住院时间及相关费用、合并症的影响以及辅助放疗后的恢复能力。
相似文献
1
Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.
Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.
2
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
3
Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135328.88101.53.
4
Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Sep;122(3):702-709. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181823c15.
5
Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):534-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3ccc.
6
[Muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 May 15;35(5):605-610. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202011020.
7
Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Jan;35(1):74-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667046. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;125(5):1335-1341. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb4a.
9
A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438-1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.
10
Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Oct;35(8):594-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688719. Epub 2019 May 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessing Donor Site Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life in Free Flap Microsurgery: An Overview.
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):36. doi: 10.3390/life15010036.
2
Current Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction and the Implications of Impending Changes to Insurance Reimbursement.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43855. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Transversus abdominus plane blocks do not reduce rates of postoperative prolonged opioid use following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a nationwide longitudinal analysis.
Eur J Plast Surg. 2023;46(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s00238-022-01996-5. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
4
Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Breast J. 2022 Jun 24;2022:7857158. doi: 10.1155/2022/7857158. eCollection 2022.
5
Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2618-2630. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02289-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Preoperative Long-term Therapeutic Subcutaneous Heparin Administration into Abdomen: Possible Cause for Nonobstructive Microvascular Flap Failure.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 17;9(2):e3400. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003400. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Does surgical procedure type impact postoperative pain and recovery in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction?
Arch Plast Surg. 2020 Jul;47(4):324-332. doi: 10.5999/aps.2019.01417. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Use of autologous dermal flap as mesh coverage in the treatment of large abdominal-wall defect in patients following massive weight loss: presentation of a novel surgical technique.
Hernia. 2020 Apr;24(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02127-4. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases.
Gland Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):477-485. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.08.08.
10
The Pedicled LICAP Flap Combined with a Free Abdominal Flap In Autologous Breast Reconstructions.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan 12;6(1):e1562. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001562. eCollection 2018 Jan.
本文引用的文献
1
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
2
Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):489-93. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000339.
3
Using propensity score analysis to compare major complications between DIEP and free muscle-sparing TRAM flap breast reconstructions.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr;133(4):774-782. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000024.
4
Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):223-233. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436845.92623.9a.
5
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
6
Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3.
7
Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Aug;66(8):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
When is the deep inferior epigastric artery flap indicated for breast reconstruction in patients not treated with radiotherapy?
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;73(1):105-13. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826cafd0.
9
The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267efc5.
10
Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Aug;130(2):282-292. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182589be1.
Zotero 插件